- Open Access
Epidemiology of envenomations by terrestrial venomous animals in Brazil based on case reporting: from obvious facts to contingencies
© Chippaux 2015
- Received: 26 November 2014
- Accepted: 6 May 2015
- Published: 13 May 2015
Envenomation remains a neglected public health issue in most tropical countries. A better understanding of the epidemiology of bites and stings by venomous animals should facilitate their prevention and management. This study aimed to explore the benefits that could be derived from the compulsory notification of cases as it is now routinely practiced in Brazil.
The Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) was consulted online for the 2001–2012 period on all envenomations by venomous terrestrial animals. We studied the incidence, severity, number of deaths, gender, season of accident and time between the accident and hospital consultation.
In total, 1,192,667 accidents and 2,664 deaths from terrestrial venomous animals (snakes, scorpions, spiders, bees and caterpillars) were reported in Brazil during these 12 years, the circumstances of which are detailed in this study. Most envenomations and deaths were caused by snakebites and scorpion stings. However, incidence and mortality showed high regional variations. During this period, the steady and parallel increase of the cases from all the species resulted from several factors including the human population increase, gradual improvement of data collection system and, probably, environmental and socioeconomic factors affecting in a different way the incidence of envenomation by each zoological group and by region.
Mandatory reporting of cases appears to be a useful tool to improve the management of envenomations. However, local studies should be continued to account for the variability of accident circumstances and refine measures necessary for their management.
- Africanized bees
The evaluation of the incidence and mortality of envenomation is necessary to advocate measures that aim to reduce the accidents by venomous animal attacks and promote preventive and therapeutic measures, including the supply of appropriate amounts of antivenoms in places where they are most needed . In numerous tropical countries, envenomation remains a major neglected public health issue [2–4]. However, while the estimation of the burden becomes more precise, there is still no standardized methodology to assess the actual incidence and mortality from envenomations with a reasonable relevance and reliability. Several approaches have been suggested in the literature or by hospital and community surveys which, although providing consistent estimates, remain approximate at country scale, especially in the case of a vast and varied country [5–9].
In many ways, Brazil is an interesting model for other tropical countries . Zoological, ecological and socioeconomic diversity of Brazil favors the comparison of epidemiological situations in different environmental contexts. In addition, envenomation is studied for over one century and researches in toxinology belong to the scientific – perhaps even political – Brazilian culture [11–13]. The notification of cases has been organized for thirty years, and since 2001 the data are directly accessible online [11, 12]. In her recent review, Bochner  highlighted the inaccuracy of such an evaluation. Rightly, she pointed that the assessments made by most investigators, especially non-Brazilian ones, did not take sufficient account of the diversity of Brazil, which limited the generalizability of the results from focal studies. Since data collection now seems consolidated and functional, and that access to significant temporal series of data are ensured, it is now possible to make an analysis of the epidemiology of envenomation in Brazil. The first studies began, particularly regarding scorpionism which is predominant in Brazil .
The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of envenomation in Brazil from the data obtained from the mandatory reporting of cases in order to characterize the indicators by identifying at-risk people and circumstances according to geographical regions and major zoological groups. Based on such analysis, it will then be possible to define explanatory criteria of envenomation by venomous animal in Brazil to sustain preventive measures and management of cases and discuss the relevance and reliability of case reporting system to assess incidence and severity of envenomations. This inventory should also help comparisons with the situations in neighboring countries and validate methods for estimating the incidence and severity from other sources than the notification of cases, such as the meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in health facilities or from households, an approach that was already used in Africa and Europe [5–7].
Basic demographic (population, densities, age and gender distributions) and socioeconomic (Gross Domestic Product – GDP and Human Development Index – HDI) information was collected from the site of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE, http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/). Epidemiological data on envenomation come from the Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN – http://dtr2004.saude.gov.br/sinanweb/tabnet/dh?sinan/animaisp/bases/animaisbr.def, for the years 2001–2006 and http://dtr2004.saude.gov.br/sinanweb/index.php, for the years 2007–2012). These websites were accessed between April 15 and July 31, 2014.
Several variables – including the age, gender, year and season of the accident, time between the accident and arrival at hospital, severity and mortality of envenomations – were analyzed and compared, first between the different states of each region, and after aggregation at the regional and national levels for each zoological group of venomous animals, particularly snake and scorpion. The sex ratio expresses the incidence ratio of male to female.
All the data were transferred and analyzed using Excel® software. The trend curves and R2 correlation indices were calculated through Excel®. The comparisons were made using parametric tests (t-test, χ 2 and Pearson correlation) or non-parametric (Mann–Whitney), depending on the distribution of studied variables and number of cases/groups. The significance level was equal to 0.05. Statistical analyzes were performed using the BiostatTGV online software (http://marne.u707.jussieu.fr/biostatgv/).
Yearly number of envenomations by terrestrial venomous animals in Brazil, 2001-2012
Mean ±95 % CI
5,260.3 ± 1,602
27,206.8 ± 1,798.5
20,137.8 ± 2,805.5
39,368.3 ± 8,182.3
2,618.8 ± 756.4
5,523.6 ± 1,484.6
99,388.9 ± 16,134.6
Yearly number of deaths caused by envenomation in Brazil, 2001-2012
Mean ±95 % CI
9.25 ± 3.1
116.17 ± 12.5
12.83 ± 4
64,08 ± 12.9
1.7 ± 0.9
18 ± 5.8
222 ± 34.2
Annual incidence of envenomations per 100,000 population in Brazil according to the venomous animal, 2001-2012
Annual mortality associated with envenomations per 100,000 population in Brazil according to the venomous animal, 2001-2012
Regional incidence and mortality (per 100,000 population) according to the zoological groups
5 · 10−3
4 · 10−3
5 · 10−3
3 · 10−3
2 · 10−3
Incidence of envenomations (per 100,000 population) according to the states and zoological groups, 2001–2012 (except for caterpillar, 2007–2012)
Rio Grande do Norte
Rio de Janeiro
Rio Grande do Sul
Mato Grosso do Sul
Just over a quarter (28 %) of envenomations were attributable to snakebites, which resulted in more than half (54 %) of the deaths provoked by venomous terrestrial animals. There was no regional variation in the distribution of genera involved in snakebites, apart from Lachesis bites which were highest in North region (9 % versus less than 1 % in other regions). The genus Bothrops was responsible for over 70 % of envenomations, Crotalus genus for 7-11 % of cases according to the region, and Micrurus in less than 1 % of envenomations whatever the region. The snake was not identified in 15 % of cases.
The sex ratio was 3.4, very significantly skewed in favor of men considering a similar risk for both genders (p = 4 × 10−11). Male victims accounted for over 70 % of snakebites, regardless of the region. Only in Amapá, where over 84 % of bitten persons were males, the sex ratio differed by more than 2 standard deviations from the mean.
The severity of envenomation was similar in all regions: 50–60 % of the cases were asymptomatic or mild, 35–40 % consisted of moderate envenomations, 6–9 % were severe envenomations and 0.2 to 1 % of the cases evolved to death, especially in the North of the country. Sequels, which severity was not specified, were mentioned in 3.5 % of snakebites between 2001 and 2006. In subsequent years, the information was no longer available.
The seasonal incidence of snakebites was higher from November to May in all regions. However, differences according to seasons were more pronounced in the southern region.
Scorpion stings were the most frequent accidents inflicted by venomous terrestrial animals in Brazil (41 %) and were responsible for 30 % of deaths.
At nationwide the sex ratio, close to 1.03, seemed balanced (p = 0.85), as highlighted by Reckziegel and Pinto . However, it was observed a considerable disparity between regions and states. For example, men accounted for 66 % of scorpion stings in the North region against 46 % in the Northeast. In southern Brazil, the percentage of men stung by a scorpion was 57 % in Southeast and 54 % both in Central-West and South regions. However, despite a large apparent dispersion, no state showed a sex ratio outside 2 standard deviations.
The severity of the envenomation differed in North region where only 60 % of stings were asymptomatic or mild against 80–90 % in the other four regions. Moderate envenomations accounted for 35 % in North region while less than 15 % elsewhere. Severe envenomation were 4 % in the North region and less than 2.5 % in all other regions. Finally, case fatality rate was similar in most regions (0.2–0.3 %) except in the South region where it was nil.
The seasonal incidence showed no variation in northern Brazil and a very small decrease in the South, especially in the Southeast region from April to August.
The time before arrival at hospital was short in all regions, although the consultations were later in North region. About half of the patients were seen during the first hour (35 % in North region) and more than three-quarters arrived at the hospital before the third hour, including in northern Brazil, where consultations spread regularly during the first three hours after the sting.
Spider bites consisted of 21 % of attacks and 6 % of deaths by terrestrial venomous animals, with a strong variation according to the regions and even states (Table 6). The species responsible for the bite was not identified in 32 % of envenomations. Loxosceles were involved in 56 % of cases in which the species has been recognized, Phoneutria in 21 %, Latrodectus in 0.6 % and other species in about 22 %. However, the proportion of Loxosceles bites was 65 % in the South region, while it was 25–30 % in all other regions. For other species, the incidence was similar in all regions.
The sex ratio was balanced (1.01; p = 0.94) in the entire Brazil with a significant disparity between regions but relative homogeneity within it. In five states, the sex ratio was outside 2 standard deviations from the mean, particularly in the North region (Amazonas, Roraima and Pará). In the South, 46 % of spider bites victims were men, while in Northeast they were 58 % and in the North up to 64 %.
The severity of envenomation by spider bites was consistent across all regions. Asymptomatic or mild bites accounted for 70 to 85 % of the cases; moderate envenomations, 10–25 %; and severe envenomations, 0.5–2 %. The case fatality rate was between 0.1 in the South and Southeast regions, and 0.3–0.4 % in the others.
Accounting for 6 % of envenomation cases and 9 % of deaths, bees were weakly represented, but showed high severity. The sex ratio was 1.74 (p = 0.02). Between 60 and 68 % of the bee stings involved males with a fair homogeneity according to the regions and within them.
The specific incidence by age group was similar in all regions, which was relatively low in people under 20 years and peaked in persons between 20 and 40 years, corresponding to 35 and 40 % of all bites and a rapid decrease in older persons.
The severity of bee stings was consistent across all regions. Asymptomatic and mild stings accounted for 80 to 90 % of patients; moderate envenomations, 10 to 18 %; and severe envenomations, 0.8 to 1.3 %. Case fatality rate was 0.3 to 0.4 % in all regions.
Caterpillars, especially those belonging to the genus Lonomia, were responsible for 4 % of envenomation and 1 % of deaths provoked by venomous terrestrial animals. The distinction between Lonomia and other genera of caterpillars was no longer specified after 2006.
The sex ratio was 1.37 (p = 0.15), 58 % regarding males, showing a good homogeneity between the regions. There was no variation in incidence as a function of age.
The severity of envenomation by caterpillar was consistent across all regions showing mild envenomations in 88–95 % of patients, moderate envenomations in 5–11 % and severe envenomations in 0–1 %. Case fatality rate was nil in Central-West and North regions, by 0.1 in South and Southeast regions and up to 0.3 % in Northeast region.
The seasonal incidence was steady during all the year in North and Northeast regions. However, in Central-West, Southeast and South regions, it showed a dramatic reduction between May and October.
Patients arrived early at the hospital in all regions. Consultations occurred in less than one hour in 40–60 % of patients, and for 80 % of all patients in less than three hours.
The incidence of envenomations is the consequence, on the one hand, of the biology and behavior of the animal responsible for the envenomation which explain its presence and abundance in a particular place and, on the other hand, human activities that put victim in contact with the animal. Mortality results from both the toxicity of the venom, associated with the amount of inoculated venom, and precocity and effectiveness of treatments. This does not exclude the role of either cultural (perception of the animal by the victim and his entourage) or circumstantial (accessibility of health centers) factors which influence the healthcare seeking behavior, use of hospital treatment, the efficiency of which depends on the available means.
The description of the epidemiology of the envenomations involves two major problems. The first concerns the source of the data as highlighted by Bochner . Data based on focal studies often lack representativeness and reliability at state and regional levels due to high variability of environmental and economic conditions impacting on risks of animal encounter. However, in many cases, as until recently in Brazil, they are the only ones that are directly accessible. As a result, their analysis requires the use of statistical models to produce useful information. This was never done in Brazil, to my knowledge, but was tested in Africa and Europe [5, 6]. Case reporting, now available online in Brazil, brings an elegant and reliable solution. The second problem regards the scale of analysis that would allow health authorities to organize the prevention and management of envenomation. The main objective of this study was to provide baseline data useful for the validation of methods capable of assessing incidence and severity of envenomation in the absence of reporting of cases. In addition, it could serve to explore epidemiological methods to define a relevant scale for further analysis.
In addition, the updated data is permanent and some states provide records with a lag, sometimes after one or two years. Accordingly, the presentation of data may differ depending on the online interrogation date of the database. This may explain low variations – which do not affect the analysis and interpretation – according to reports or publications [14, 15].
One of the simplest assumption is that the increase in the number of cases follows the growth of the population, which should not modify the incidence. Consequently, the significant increase in the incidence and mortality over time indicates that other factors might be involved since 2001 (Figs. 2–3). The improvement of case reporting system was probably a valid reason, which suggests that data collection was more precise – especially in some states – but maybe that healthcare seeking behavior of the patients evolved and that they came in higher number to the hospital.
Certainly, changes in the behavior of animals and human activities affect morbidity at various levels. Some studies showed the impact of the environmental factors or ecology of venomous animals on the incidence of envenomation. A well-established example is the growth of arachnid populations – and the change in species composition – in the suburbs of big cities [16–19]. However, the ecology, biology and behavior of venomous animals require further studies to better understand the risk factors attributable to them.
Bochner and Struchiner  showed the significant influence of socioeconomic factors, such as illiteracy or agricultural activities, on snakebite incidence. The inverse correlation between the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the incidence of snakebites is at the limit of significance (r = −0.36; p = 0.06). However, there is no correlation between GDP and the incidence of accidents with other terrestrial venomous animals. The Human Development Index (HDI) is negatively correlated with the incidence of scorpion stings (r = −0.43; p = 0.03) but positively with spider bites (r = 0.38; p = 0.05) and envenomation per caterpillars (r = 0.42; p = 0.03). Finally, literacy is inversely correlated with the incidence of scorpion stings (r = −0.57; p = 0.002) but not with other accidents by venomous land animals. However, it is likely that each factor does not apply in the same manner to every situation and the impact of some of them could be different in various places or circumstances. Discrepancies of correlations between the economic indicators and incidences could be explained by the circumstances of the accidents which socioeconomic characteristics and environmental factors differ depending on the animals.
The situation is different regarding other venomous animals. It was not observed a significant correlation between the population density and incidence of envenomation by scorpion, spider, bee or caterpillar. In addition to the environmental factors certainly important, it is likely that arthropods are more adaptable to suburban or urban conditions than vertebrates [17, 18, 22]. Thus, if scorpion stings seem fairly widely distributed throughout Brazil (with the notable exception of few northern states and those of the South region), spider bites, bee stings and caterpillar attacks were predominant in southern Brazil, especially spider envenomations, which incidence is more than ten times higher in the South region than in the others (Table 5). Accidents caused by arthropods are less related to professional activities and occur more often at home and sometimes even at night [17–19, 22, 23]. It could also explain a more homogeneous incidence according to the gender and age.
In addition, a higher case fatality rate in northern Brazil, could be related to case management, possibly less efficient than in southern Brazil where the availability of treatment resources is better. Other indicators could be proposed: the urbanization rate or frequency of family farms might be more accurate, but they were not obtained for all Brazilian states.
An analysis at a more focal scale, as it was recently tested in the state of Rio de Janeiro, covering all factors would certainly be very informative and more accurate .
The incidence of snakebites is lower, even in northern Brazil, than that expected in comparison with Africa and Asia [2, 3, 5]. An explanation is indirectly suggested by Padoch et al.  who observed that Amazonian peoples divided their time between the city and the forest according to the seasons and agricultural activities. Thus, their presence in rural areas, i.e. the period at risk because most snakebites occur outside cities, is reduced over time decreasing the expected incidence.
Every year in Brazil, there are about 100,000 envenomations following bites or stings by venomous terrestrial animals, resulting in 220 deaths. Over a quarter of the accidents – but half the deaths – result from a snakebite, while more than a third of cases and a quarter of deaths are the consequence of scorpion stings. In addition, each year nearly 1,000 patients suffer from sequels, the severity of which was not detailed, following a snakebite.
Snakebites are three times more common in men, whereas for other venomous land animals, the sex ratio is generally more balanced even if there are some regional differences. The incidence of envenomation increases with age until 65 years and then decreases. The results are consistent with higher risks in rural areas, especially for snakebites, and/or peri-urban areas for arthropod attacks.
Less than 10 % of envenomations are described as severe, and case fatality rate, constant over time, remains below 0.8 %. It increases at both ends of life – in children under 10 years and people aged 60 and over – especially with regard to scorpion stings.
The change in the seasonal incidence is not marked in northern Brazil while in south, incidence decreases between April and May, and from September to October.
Overall, the time between the accident and the medical care is brief – less than three hours – for the most cases of envenomation, which explains the favorable clinical evolution in numerous cases.
Mandatory reporting of cases, if functional and in routine, produces important indicators to improve the prevention and management of envenomations. It leads especially to provide relevant epidemiological data for health authorities in order to adjust the therapeutic offer, including antivenoms, in respect to the quantitative, qualitative and geographical actual demands.
This approach, highly useful, does not exclude the importance of more focused studies that specify many parameters, such as the clinical presentation, evolution and consequences of envenomation, treatment customs, geographic and cultural specificities, and other factors that can affect the treatment of envenomation.
- Chippaux JP. Estimating the global burden of snakebite can help to improve management. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e221.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP. Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(5):515–24.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e218.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. Guidelines for the production control and regulation of snake antivenom immunoglobulins. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. http://www.who.int/bloodproducts/snake_antivenoms/snakeantivenomguideline.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2014.
- Chippaux JP. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analytic approach. Toxicon. 2011;57(4):586–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP. Epidemiology of snakebites in Europe: a systematic review of the literature. Toxicon. 2012;59(1):86–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP, Saz-Parkinson Z, Amate Blanco JM. Epidemiology of snakebite in Europe: comparison of data from the literature and case reporting. Toxicon. 2013;76:206–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP. Epidemiological investigation on envenomation: from theory to practice. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2012;18(4):446–50. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1678-91992012000400014&script=sci_arttext.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guyavarch E, Chippaux JP. Mesurer l’incidence des morsures de serpents: méthodologie d’enquête auprès des ménages (l’exemple de Bandafassi, Sénégal). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2005;98(4):269–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP. Control of ophidism in Brasil: a model for Africa. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2010;16(2):88–190. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1678-91992010000200001&script=sci_arttext.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochner R, Struchiner CJ. Acidentes por animais peçonhentos e sistemas nacionais de informação. Cad Saúde Pública. 2002;18(3):735–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochner R. Sistemas nacionais de informação de acidentes por animais peçonhentos. Gaz Méd Bahia. 2012;82(Supl 1):64–77.Google Scholar
- Bochner R, Struchiner CJ. Epidemiologia dos acidentes ofídicos nos últimos 100 anos no Brasil: uma revisão. Cad Saúde Pública. 2003;19(1):7–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochner R. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2013;19:29. http://www.scielo.br/article_plus.php?pid=S1678-91992013000100205&tlng=en&lng=en.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reckziegel GC, Pinto Jr VL. Scorpionism in Brazil in the years 2000 to 2012. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2014;20:46. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1678-91992014000200337&script=sci_arttext.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Von Eickstedt VRD, Ribeiro LA, Candido DM, Albuquerque MJ, Jorge MT. Evolution of scorpionism by Tityus bahiensis (Perty) and Tityus serrulatus Lutz and Mello and geographical distribution of the two species in the state of São Paulo – Brazil. J Venom Anim Toxins. 1996;2(2):92–105. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-79301996000200003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Roodt AR, Garcia SI, Salomón OD, Segre L, Dolab JA, Funes RF, et al. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of scorpionism by Tityus trivittatus in Argentina. Toxicon. 2003;41(8):971–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Roodt AR. Comments on environmental and sanitary aspects of the scorpionism by Tityus trivittatus in Buenos Aires city, Argentina. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(4):1434–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cristiano MP, Cardoso DC, Raymundo MS. Contextual analysis and epidemiology of spider bite in southern Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(9):943–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochner R, Struchiner CJ. Aspectos ambientais e socio-econômicos relacionados à incidência de acidentes ofídicos no Estado do Rio de Janeiro de 1990 a 1996: uma análise exploratória. Cad Saúde Pública. 2004;20(4):976–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP, Postigo JR. Appraisal of snakebite incidence and mortality in Bolivia. Toxicon. 2014;84(1):28–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amorim AM, Carvalho FM, Lira-da-Silva RM, Brazil TK. Acidentes por escorpião em uma área do Nordeste de Amaralina, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003;36(1):51–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107(1):71–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Padoch C, Brondizio E, Costa S, Pinedo-Vasquez M, Sears RR, Siqueira A. Urban forest and rural cities: multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(2):2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art2/. [accessed 24 July 2014].Google Scholar
- Ferreira Jr RS, Almeida RA, Barraviera SR, Barraviera B. Historical perspective and human consequences of Africanized bee stings in the Americas. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2012;15(2):97–108.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar