Skip to main content
Download PDF

Antibacterial potential of a basic phospholipase A2 (VRV-PL-VIIIa) from Daboia russelii pulchella (Russell’s viper) venom

Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases volume 21, Article number: 17 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Microbial/bacterial resistance against antibiotics poses a serious threat to public health. Furthermore, the side effects of these antibiotics have stimulated tremendous interest in developing new molecules from diverse organisms as therapeutic agents. This study evaluates the antibacterial potential of a basic protein, Vipera russellii venom phospholipase A2 fraction VIIIa (VRV-PL-VIIIa), from Daboia russelii pulchella venom against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Methods

The antibacterial potential of VRV-PL-VIIIa in the presence and absence of an inhibitor (p-bromophenacyl bromide) was tested against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and the minimum inhibitory concentration was determined by microdilution tests.

Results

VRV-PL-VIIIa demonstrated potent antibacterial activities against all the human pathogenic strains tested. It more effectively inhibited such gram-positive bacteria as Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis, when compared to the gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella paratyphi. It inhibited bacterial growth at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 11.1 to 19.2 μg/mL. The anti-bacterial potential of VRV-PL-VIIIa was comparable to the standards gentamycin, chlorophenicol and streptomycin. The PLA2’s hemolytic and antibacterial activities were strongly correlated. Furthermore, even in the presence of p-bromophenacyl bromide, intense antibacterial activity was observed, suggesting a dissociation or partial overlapping of the bactericidal/antimicrobial domains.

Conclusion

VRV-PL-VIIIa demonstrated potent antibacterial activities against all the human pathogenic strains tested. The study shows that despite a strong correlation between enzymatic and antimicrobial activities of VRV-PL-VIIIa, it may possess additional properties that mimic the bactericidal/membrane permeability-increasing protein. This study encourages further in-depth studies on the molecular mechanisms of antibacterial properties of VRV-PL-VIIIa, which would thereby facilitate development of this protein into a possible therapeutic lead molecule for treating bacterial infections.

Background

Microbial/bacterial resistance against antibiotics constitutes a therapeutic problem that poses a significant threat to public health [1–4]. The prevalence of bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics has prompted an intense search for new therapeutic agents from diverse animal origins [5]. Proteins/peptides with potent antimicrobial activities are found in many secretions of organisms, including snakes [5, 6]. Venoms from snakes, particularly Crotalidae, are known to be a rich natural source for the discovery and development of novel antimicrobial agents [6, 7]. Among the various components of snake venom, phospoholipase A2 (svPLA2) enzyme, apart from its catalytic activity of hydrolyzing the sn-2 ester bond of glycerophospholipids, shows other important toxic/pharmacologic effects that include myonecrosis, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, as well as hemolytic, hemorrhagic, hypertensive, anticoagulant, platelet-aggregation-inhibiting and edema-inducing activities [8, 9]. This array of biological actions may be either dependent or independent of catalytic activities. The svPLA2s are also reported to act as antimicrobial agents and are emphasized for their potential as therapeutic lead molecules [6, 7]. Crotapotin, a secretory phospholipase A2 isolated from the venom of Crotalus durissus terrificus, has been demonstrated to exert antibacterial activity as well as antiviral activity against the human immunodeficiency virus [10–12]. Acidic PLA2s, both Asp49 and Lys49 PLA2 homologues, have previously been shown to perform bactericidal activity [13–15]. A cationic protein isolated from venom of the inland taipan (Oxyuranus microlepidotus) has been demonstrated to selectively and dose-dependently kill the gram-positive bacteria through membrane disruption [16]. Recently, a phospholipase A2 from the venom of the saw-scaled viper with novel bactericidal and membrane-damaging activities was characterized [17]. These molecules are shown to be highly attractive due to their biochemical diversity, and broad spectrum of activity against enveloped bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa, and parasites [6, 7, 18].

Despite the therapeutic potential of svPLA2s as antimicrobial agents, very few with bactericidal/antimicrobial activities have been characterized [6, 18, 19]. Found in India, Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) is a widely distributed snake responsible for potent toxic and lethal effects [20–23]. Despite several reports on its various biological effects, relatively little is known regarding its antimicrobial activity [20–25]. Furthermore, there are no reports available in relation to the antimicrobial activity exhibited by PLA2s from the venom of Daboia russelii pulchella. A basic PLA2, namely Vipera russellii venom phospholipase A2 fraction VIIIa (VRV-PL-VIIIa), isolated from Daboia russelii pulchella venom is reported to provoke various biological effects such as edema, platelet aggregation, pulmonary hemorrhage etc. [26, 27]. In the present work, we evaluate the antibacterial potential of VRV-PL-VIIIa and investigate its possible biochemical mechanism of action. Additionally, this study exemplifies the therapeutic utility of VRV-PL-VIIIa as an antimicrobial agent.

Methods

Venom of Daboia russelii pulchella (Southern region) was purchased from the Irula Co-operative Society Ltd. (India). Agar, beef extract, yeast extract and peptone were bought from Hi Media Private Ltd. (India). The p-Bromophenacyl bromide (p-BPB) and other chemicals used were all of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma Chemicals Ltd. (USA). Authentic pure clinical isolated cultures of human pathogenic bacteria – Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Vibrio cholerae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella paratyphi – were obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), B.G. Nagara, Karnataka, India. These are all human pathogens that have developed some resistance to common antibiotics particularly in the clinical environment. Bacteria were multiplied in nutrient agar at 36 ± 2 °C. After 2 days, cultures were harvested and prepared at a final concentration of 1 × 108 cfu/mL and used for the in vitro inhibition assay.

Isolation of VRV-PL-VIIIa and chemical modification by p-Bromophenacyl bromide

VRV-PL-VIIIa from the venom of Daboia ruselii pulchella was purified until homogeneous as described previously by the method of Kasturi and Gowda [26], with modifications by Srinivasan [27]. The protein concentration was estimated by Lowry’s method. Chemical modification of PLA2 by p-Bromophenacyl bromide (p-BPB) was carried out as described by Condrea et al. [28]. Briefly, 100 μL of 40 mM p-BPB in acetone was added to 3 mL of PLA2 solution (0.5 mg/mL, in 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.5). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 40 min, and then acidified with glacial acetic acid to pH 4.0 to stop the reaction. Excess of reagent was removed by dialyzing against 0.05 M Tris–HCl buffer pH 7.5.

Phospholipase A2 activity

The phospholipase A2 assay was carried out according to the method described by Bhat and Gowda [29]. Phosphatidyl choline (PC) was diluted with petroleum ether (60–80 °C) to obtain a concentration of 1000 nmoles/50 mL. The reaction mixture containing VRV-PL-VIIIa (5 μg) was augmented to 680 μL with water. To the reaction mixture, 200 μL of ether, 100 μL of Tris–HCl buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.5) and 20 μL of CaCl2 (0.4 M) were added. The total reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. After incubation, 0.5 mL of Dole’s mixture (isopropanol:pet ether:1NH2SO4, 40:10:1) was added, mixed and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 3 min. To the organic phase, 0.5 mL of CHCl3:pet ether (1:5) was added, mixed and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 3 min. To the upper phase, cobalt reagent [1.35 vol. of triethanolamine increased to 10 mL with solution A (6 g of CO(NO3)2.6H2O + 0.8 mL glacial acetic acid) and 7 mL of solution B (saturated Na2SO4)] was added, mixed and centrifuged 1000 rpm for 3 min. The upper organic phase was carefully transferred and 0.75 mL of α-nitroso-β-naphthol reagent (0.4 % α-nitroso-β-naphthol in 96 % ethanol) was added. The intensity of the orange coloration is directly proportional to the amount of cobalt present. After 30 min, 2 mL of ethanol was added to dilute the contents and absorbance was read at 540 nm. The amount of free fatty acid released was estimated using the standard linolenic acid curve. The enzyme activity was expressed as nmoles of fatty acid released/minute/mg of protein.

For inhibition studies, VRV-PL-VIIIa (5 μg) was pre-incubated with or without a different concentration of p-Bromophenacyl bromide (1–6 μm) at 37 °C for 15 min. Appropriate controls were set up and further experiments were performed as described above. The inhibition is expressed as a percentage, considering the activity of venom alone as 100 %.

Hemolytic activity assay

Hemolytic (direct/indirect) activity of isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa was determined according to the method of Boman and Kaletta [30], using packed human erythrocytes (blood group A). The human erythrocytes used for the study were sourced from previously published work, which had ethical approval from the ethics committee of the University of Mysore (UOM) for the withdrawal of blood [23]. The direct and indirect hemolytic assays were carried out using washed erythrocytes. For the direct hemolytic assay, the packed erythrocytes (1 mL) were suspended in nine volumes of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), which formed the stock. The stock (1 mL) was incubated with various concentrations of isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa (0–5 μg) for 30 min at 37 °C. For the indirect hemolytic assay, stock was prepared by mixing packed erythrocytes (1 mL), egg yolk (1 mL) and phosphate-buffered saline (8 mL). One milliliter of suspension from stock was incubated with various concentrations of isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa (0–6 μg) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was terminated by adding 10 mL of ice-cold PBS and then centrifuged at 4 °C and 800 g. The amount of hemoglobin released in the supernatant was measured at 540 nm. One milliliter of stock erythrocytes with 10 mL ice-cold PBS alone was defined as constituting 0 % lysis.

For inhibition studies, VRV-PL-VIIIa (6 μg) was pre-incubated with or without a different concentration of p-Bromophenacyl bromide (1–6 μM) at 37 °C for 15 min. Appropriate controls were set up and further experiments were accomplished as described above. The inhibition is expressed as a percentage, considering the activity of venom alone as 100 %.

Bactericidal activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa

Bactericidal activity was evaluated by the well diffusion method on nutrient agar medium [31]. This was confirmed by the inhibitory effect on bacterial growth as reflected by the inhibition zone, compared to that of known antibiotics such as gentamicin (G), chloramphenicol (Cp) and streptomycin (Sm) at 30 μg/mL. The sterile nutrient agar medium (20 mL) in petri dishes was uniformly smeared using sterile cotton swabs with pure test cultures of the human pathogenic bacteria S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, S. typhi, V. cholerae, K. pneumoniae and S. paratyphi. The nutrient agar media was prepared by dissolving 0.3 % beef extract, 0.3 % yeast extract, 0.5 % peptone, 0.5 % NaCl and 1.5 % agar in 1:l of distilled water and 0.2 % methanol (v/v). The wells of 5 mm diameter were made using a sterile cork borer in each petri dish and the isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa (0-12 μg) pre-incubated independently with or without p-Bromophenacyl bromide (15 μM) was added; a blank well loaded without test compound was considered the control. For each treatment, ten replicates were prepared. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the resulting zone of inhibition was measured by comparing the control and the standard antibiotics.

For inhibition studies, VRV-PL-VIIIa (12 μg) was pre-incubated with or without a different concentration of p-Bromophenacyl bromide (1–6 μM) at 37 °C for 15 min and antimicrobial activity was assessed as described above with appropriate controls. The inhibition is expressed as a percentage, considering the activity of venom alone as 100 %.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)

The minimum inhibitory concentration of the isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa and the antibiotics used were determined by serial dilution in the nutrient agar, with concentrations ranging from 2–20 μg/mL. The inoculum was prepared overnight from fresh broth culture in nutrient broth and plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. MIC was recorded as the lowest VRV-PL-VIIIa at which the antibiotic concentrations demonstrated no visible growth in the broth [32].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using the software SPSS (Windows version 10.0.1; SPSS Inc., USA) employing a one-way Student’s t test; p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant when compared with relevant controls. All results are presented as mean ± SD.

Results and discussion

The snake venom PLA2s (svPLA2s), apart from their well known toxic and lethal effects, are also known to be of therapeutic utility, particularly as bactericidal/antibacterial agents [6, 19]. In a previous study, it was shown that the crude Russell’s viper venom from India exhibited strong antibacterial actions [25]. However, the principal component responsible for it was unexplored. In the present work, we evaluate the basic PLA2 (VRV-PL-VIIIa) of Daboia russelii pulchella venom for its antibacterial activity on different human pathogenic bacteria [26, 27].

When tested, VRV-PL-VIIIa (0–12 μg/mL) showed a broad spectrum of highly significant antibacterial activities by producing a clear zone of inhibition that was dose-dependent in the range of 17–30 mm (Fig. 1 – a and b) (Table 1). Interestingly, it showed more significant inhibition of gram-positive bacteria including S. aureus and B. subtilis (in the range of 27–32 mm) in relation to such gram-negative species as E. coli, S. typhi, V. cholerae, K. pneumoniae and S. paratyphi (in the range of 16–22 mm) (Table 1). Furthermore, it was interesting to note that VRV-PL-VIIIa exhibited similar or greater antibacterial activities than those of the standards gentamicin, chlorophenicol and streptomycin (which was in the range of 16–20 mm) (Table 1). When VRV-PL-VIIIa was tested via the agar dilution assay for determining minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), it significantly inhibited the bacterial growth with MIC values ranging from 11.2 to 20 μg/mL, when compared to standard antibiotics whose range was between 18 and 24 μg/mL (Table 2). Thus, VRV-PL-VIIIa was as potent as standard antibiotics in inhibiting the growth of bacterial strains.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Dose-dependent bactericidal activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa against different human pathogenic strains – S. aureus, E. coli, B. subtilis, S. typhi – in agar diffusion assays. The diameter of the clear zone was measured and plotted after subtracting the diameter of the well (5 mm). Results are mean ± SD for three independent assays, each performed in triplicate. b Dose-dependent bactericidal activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa against different human pathogenic strains – V. cholerae, K. pneumonia, S. paratyphi – in agar diffusion assays. The diameter of the clear zone was measured and plotted after subtracting the diameter of the well (5 mm). Results are mean ± SD for three independent assays, each performed in triplicate

Full size image
Table 1 Antibacterial activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa and standard antibiotics
Full size table
Table 2 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of VRV-PL-VIIIa and standard antibiotics by serial dilution method
Full size table

A strong correlation is usually found between the PLA2’s hemolytic and antibacterial activities [6, 19, 25]. The VRV-PL-VIIIa also showed a potent hemolytic (indirect) activity that is usually associated with svPLA2s. It was found that VRV-PL-VIIIa produces a dose-dependent hemolysis of blood cells and at 5 μg concentration provoked 100 % hemolysis (Fig. 2). From these data it may be concluded that the antibacterial effects of VRV-PL-VIIIa are dependent upon catalytic activity, i.e., an enzymatic membrane degradation effect that is usually observed in sPLA2s [6, 33]. The correlation between PLA2, hemolytic and antibacterial activities indicates that the catalytically activity of PLA2 is principally involved in bactericidal/antibacterial activities [6, 19, 25]. However, despite the existence of another mechanism, namely svPLA2 isolated from Bothrops asper (also classified within group IIA) venom, which was shown to directly kill both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [13].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dose-dependent indirect hemolytic activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa. VRV-PL-VIIIa (0–5 μg) in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was incubated with erythrocytes, egg yolk and PBS (1:1:8 v/v) for 10 min at 37 °C. The released hemoglobin in the supernatant was measured by reading absorbance at 540 nm. The results are expressed as ± S.E.M. (n = 4)

Full size image

Furthermore, a toxin from B. asper (myotoxin II, a catalytically inactive Lys49 PLA2) exhibited a bactericidal mechanism that was independent of catalytic activity [13, 6, 19]. Additional in-depth studies showed that a short sequence of the protein, corresponding to residues 115–129 of its cytolytic C-terminal region, was responsible for its bactericidal activity, emphasizing the fact that bactericidal activity is not associated with enzymatic activities [6, 13, 19]. Similarly, the study found that when VRV-PL-VIIIa was pre-incubated with p-BPB, an inhibitor of svPLA2 enzymatic activity, both enzymatic and antibacterial activities were inhibited (Fig. 3 and Table 3) [34]. However, it should be noted that there was incomplete abolition of antibacterial activity (Table 3), even though the enzymatic activity was completely abolished (Table 4). This suggests a dissociation between enzymatic activity and bactericidal/antibacterial activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa. It is usually observed that the potent bactericidal activity of sPLA2s is accomplished by binding to anionic surfaces along with the enzymatic degradation of phospholipids in the target membranes, i.e., preferentially in the case of gram-positive species. However, the bactericidal activity against gram-negatives is known to require a synergistic action of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI), and is also equally dependent on enzymatic-based membrane degradation [13, 6, 17, 19].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bactericidal activity against different human pathogenic strains of VRV-PL-VIIIa pre-incubated with or without p-Bromophenacyl bromide. VRV-PL-VIIIa (12 μg/mL) was pre-incubated with or without a different concentration of p-Bromophenacyl bromide (6 μM) at 37 °C for 15 min and bactericidal activity was estimated in agar diffusion assay. The diameter of the clear zone was measured and plotted after subtracting the diameter of the well (5 mm). Results are expressed as mean ± SD for three independent assays, each performed in triplicate

Full size image
Table 3 Antibacterial activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa with or without p-Bromophenacyl bromide (p-BPB)
Full size table
Table 4 Phospholipase A2 activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa with or without p-Bromophenacyl bromide (p-BPB)
Full size table

It has been demonstrated that, in addition to cationic properties of PLA2 molecules, the polyanionic properties of lipoteichoic acids from bacterial cell wall promote the attack of membrane phospholipids by svPLA2s. Therefore, the action mode of svPLAs depends on the type of bacteria species involved (gram-positive or negative). Recently, an association was shown between antibacterial and enzymatic activity of an antibacterial PLA2 (EcTx-I) purified from Echis carinatus venom [6]. However, the present study found that the bactericidal activity of VRV-PL-VIIIa is partially independent of catalytic activity and antibacterial activities (Tables 3 and 4), which is supported by the homogenous nature of the protein with no other associated enzymatic activities (such as L-amino-oxidase, proteases etc.) in the preparation (data not shown). Therefore, the VRV-PL-VIIIa bactericidal mechanism may include “fatal depolarization” of the bacterial membrane, creation of physical holes in the membrane, scrambling of normal distribution of lipids between the bilayer leaflets, damage of critical intracellular targets after internalization of the peptide, and also inhibition of macromolecular biosynthesis as observed in many svPLA(2)s and/or interaction with specific vital components inside the bacteria [6, 35].

It was reported that PLA2s purified from Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus rely on a membrane-permeabilizing mechanism to exert their bactericidal effects [36]. A recent study showed the presence of a large number of PLA2-sensitive phospholipid domains/composition, rather than only the phosphatidylcholine (PC) content of a particular membrane that determines the extent of membrane damage by a particular venom PLA2 enzyme [37]. This might be one of the reasons for the differential inhibitory potency of VRV-PL-VIIIa on various bacterial species. Therefore, it may be concluded that the isolated VRV-PL-VIIIa phospholipase A2, will manifest its antimicrobial activity not only by acting upon the membrane through its enzymatic activity, but also by other mechanisms as discussed above, independently of its catalytic activities. Further in-depth studies on molecular mechanism of action of VRV-PL-VIIIa antibacterial activity would be of interest to develop this as a therapeutic lead molecule for application.

Conclusion

This study shows that VRV-PL-VIIIa – a PLA2 from Daboia russelii pulchella venom – presents potent antibacterial activity. Significant antibacterial activity is observed, even in presence of an inhibitor of PLA2 enzymatic activity (p-BPB), suggesting a dissociation or partial overlapping of the bactericidal/antimicrobial domains of the enzyme. This study demonstrates that although there is a strong correlation between enzymatic and antimicrobial activities of VRV-PL-VIIIa, it may also possess other properties that mimic the bactericidal/membrane permeability-increasing protein. These results should encourage further in-depth studies on molecular mechanisms of anti-bacterial properties of VRV-PL-VIIIa, which would thereby facilitate its development into a therapeutic lead molecule for treating bacterial infections.

Ethics committee approval

The use of human erythrocytes was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Mysore (UOM).

References

  1. Norrby SR, Nord CE, Finch R, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Lack of development of new antimicrobial drugs: a potential serious threat to public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;52:115–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhury R, Panda S, Singh DV. Emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance: a global problem. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30(4):384–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Echols RM. A long and winding road; evolution of antimicrobial drug development – crisis management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(11):1311–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghafur A. The Chennai declaration: a solution to the antimicrobial resistance problem in the Indian subcontinent. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(8):1190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002;415:389–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samy RP, Gopalakrishnakone P, Stiles BG, Girish KS, Swamy SN, Hemshekhar M, et al. Snake venom phospholipases A(2): a novel tool against bacterial diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(36):6150–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perumal Samy R, Pachiappan A, Gopalakrishnakone P, Thwin MM, Hian YE, Chow VTK, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of natural toxins and animal venoms tested against Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kini RM. Phospholipase A2 - a complex multifunctional protein puzzle. In: Wiley J, editor. Venom phospholipase A2 enzymes: structure, function and mechanism. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1997. p. 1228.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gutiérrez JM, Lomonte B. Phospholipases A2: unveiling the secrets of a functionally versatile group of snake venom toxins. Toxicon. 2013;62:27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soares AM, Mancin AC, Cecchini AL, Arantes EC, Franca SC, Gutierrez JM, et al. Effects of chemical modifications of croprotein B, the phospholipase A2 subunit of croprotein from Crotalus durissus terrificus snake venom, on its enzymatic and pharmacological activities. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2001;33(9):877–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Toyama MH, de Oliveira DG, Beriam LOS, Novello JC, Rodrigues-Simioni L, Marangoni S. Structural, enzymatic and biological properties of new PLA2 isoform from Crotalus durissus terrificus venom. Toxicon. 2003;41(8):1033–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sampaio SC, Brigatte P, Sousa-e-Silva MC, dos Santos EC, Rangel-Santos AC, Curi R, et al. Contribution of crotoxin for the inhibitory effect of Crotalus durissus terrificus snake venom on macrophage function. Toxicon. 2003;41(7):899–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paramo L, Lomonte B, Pizarro-Cerda J, Bengoechea JA, Gorvel JP, Moreno E. Bactericidal activity of Lys49 and Asp49 myotoxic phospholipases A2 from Bothrops asper snake venom: synthetic Lys49 myotoxin II-(115–129)-peptide identifies its bactericidal region. Eur J Biochem. 1998;253:452–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vargas LJ, Londoño M, Quintana JC, Rua C, Segura C, Lomonte B, et al. An acidic phospholipase A2 with antibacterial activity from Porthidium nasutum snake venom. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;161(4):341–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soares AM, Andrião-Escarso SH, Bortoleto RK, Rodrigues-Simioni L, Arni RK, Ward RJ. Dissociation of enzymatic and pharmacological properties of piratoxins-I and -III, two myotoxic phospholipases A2 from Bothrops pirajai snake venom. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;387:188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nair DG, Fry BG, Alewood P, Kumar PP, Kini RM. Antimicrobial activity of omwaprin, a new member of the waprin family of snake venom proteins. Biochem J. 2007;402(1):93–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perumal Samy R, Gopalakrishnakone P, Bow H, Puspharaj PN, Chow VT. Identification and characterization of a phospholipase A2 from the venom of the Saw-scaled viper: Novel bactericidal and membrane damaging activities. Biochimie. 2010;92(12):1854–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira HA. Novel therapies based on cationic antimicrobial peptides. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2006;7(4):292–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Oliveira Junior NG. e Silva Cardoso MH, Franco OL. Snake venoms: attractive antimicrobial proteinaceous compounds for therapeutic purposes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(24):4645–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jayanthi GP, Gowda TV. Geographical variation in India in the composition and lethal potency of Russell’s viper (Vipera russelli) venom. Toxicon. 1988;26(3):257–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodhams BJ, Wilson SE, Xin BC, Hutton RA. Differences between the venoms of two sub-species of Russell’s viper: Vipera russelli pulchella and Vipera russelli siamensis. Toxicon. 1990;28(4):427–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prasad NB, Uma B, Bhatt SK, Gowda VT. Comparative characterisation of Russell’s viper (Daboia/Vipera russelli) venoms from different regions of the Indian peninsula. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1428(2–4):121–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dhananjaya BL, Zameer F, Girish KS, D’Souza CJ. Anti-venom potential of aqueous extract of stem bark of Mangifera indica L. against Daboia russelii (Russell’s viper) venom. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2011;48(3):175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Venkatesh M, Prasad N, Sing T, Gowda TV. Purification, characterization, and chemical modification of neurotoxic peptide from Daboia russelii snake venom of India. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2013;27(6):295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perumal Samy R, Gopalakrishnakone P, Thwin MM, Chow TK, Bow H, Yap EH, et al. Antibacterial activity of snake, scorpion and bee venoms: a comparison with purified venom phospholipase A2 enzymes. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102(3):650–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kasturi S, Gowda TV. Purification and characterization of a major phospholipase A2 from Russell’s viper (Vipera russelli) venom. Toxicon. 1989;27(2):229–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Srinivasan S. Mechanism of action of snake venom toxic phospholipases, Thesis. India: University of Mysore; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Condrea E, Fletcher JE, Rapuano BE, Yang CC, Rosenberg P. Effect of modification of one histidine residue on the enzymatic and pharmacological properties of a toxic phospholipase A2 from Naja nigricollis snake venom and less toxic phospholipases A2 from Hemachatus haemachatus and Naja naja atra snake venoms. Toxicon. 1981;19(1):61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhat MK, Gowda TV. Purification and characterization of a myotoxic phospholipase A2 from Indian cobra (Naja naja naja) venom. Toxicon. 1989;27(8):861–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boman HG, Kaletta U. Chromatography of rattlesnake venom, a separation of three phosphodiesterases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957;24(3):619–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, Trevino EA. Methods for testing antimicrobial effectiveness. In: Baron EJ, Petrson LR, Finegold SM, editors. Bailey and Scott’s diagnostics microbiology. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Co; 1990. p. 171–94.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA. Introduction to microbiology. 5th ed. San Francisco: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co Inc; 1996. p. 681–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Buckland AG, Wilton DC. The antibacterial properties of secreted phospholipases A2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1488:71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rudrammaji LM, Machiah KD, Kantha TP, Gowda TV. Role of catalytic function in the antiplatelet activity of phospholipase A2 cobra (Naja naja naja) venom. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;219(1–2):39–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Park CB, Kim HS, Kim SC. Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;244(1):253–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shen Z, Cho W. Highly efficient immobilization of phospholipase A2 and its biomedical applications. J Lipid Res. 1995;36(5):1147–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saikia D, Bordoloi NK, Chattopadhyay P, Choklingam S, Ghosh SS, Mukherjee AK. Differential mode of attack on membrane phospholipids by an acidic phospholipase A2 (RVVA-PLA2-I) from Daboia russelli venom. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1818(12):3149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

DBL thanks Jain University for the constant encouragement to the progress of research. SS and DBL acknowledges the Adichunchanagiri Mahasamstana Mutt and Shikshana Trust for providing facilities in the Adichunchanagiri Biotechnology and Cancer Research Institute (ABCRI). We thank Balagangadharanatha Swamiji Institute for Technology (BGS-IT) and Sri Adichunchangiri College of Pharmacy for the support to carry out the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Toxinology Group, Adichunchanagiri Biotechnology and Cancer Research Institute (ABCRI), Balagangadharanatha Nagara, Mandya District, Karnataka, India

    Shivalingaiah Sudharshan & Bhadrapura Lakkappa Dhananjaya

  2. Toxinology/Toxicology and Drug Discovery Unit, Center for Emerging Technologies (CET), Jain University, Jakksandra Post, Ramanagara, 562112, India

    Bhadrapura Lakkappa Dhananjaya

Authors
  1. Shivalingaiah Sudharshan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhadrapura Lakkappa Dhananjaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhadrapura Lakkappa Dhananjaya.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

DBL contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. SS analyzed and interpreted data. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sudharshan, S., Dhananjaya, B.L. Antibacterial potential of a basic phospholipase A2 (VRV-PL-VIIIa) from Daboia russelii pulchella (Russell’s viper) venom. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis 21, 17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-015-0014-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-015-0014-y

Keywords

Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases

ISSN: 1678-9199

Contact us