Open Access

Neuroactive compounds obtained from arthropod venoms as new therapeutic platforms for the treatment of neurological disorders

  • Victoria Monge-Fuentes1,
  • Flávia Maria Medeiros Gomes1,
  • Gabriel Avohay Alves Campos1,
  • Juliana de Castro Silva1,
  • Andréia Mayer Biolchi1,
  • Lilian Carneiro dos Anjos1,
  • Jacqueline Coimbra Gonçalves1,
  • Kamila Soares Lopes1 and
  • Márcia Renata Mortari1Email author
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases201521:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-015-0031-x

Received: 9 December 2014

Accepted: 28 July 2015

Published: 8 August 2015

Abstract

The impact of neurological disorders in society is growing with alarming estimations for an incidence increase in the next decades. These disorders are generally chronic and can affect individuals early during productive life, imposing real limitations on the performance of their social roles. Patients can have their independence, autonomy, freedom, self-image, and self-confidence affected. In spite of their availability, drugs for the treatment of these disorders are commonly associated with side effects, which can vary in frequency and severity. Currently, no effective cure is known. Nowadays, the biopharmaceutical research community widely recognizes arthropod venoms as a rich source of bioactive compounds, providing a plethora of possibilities for the discovery of new neuroactive compounds, opening up novel and attractive opportunities in this field. Several identified molecules with a neuropharmacological profile can act in the central nervous system on different neuronal targets, rendering them useful tools for the study of neurological disorders. In this context, this review aims to describe the current main compounds extracted from arthropod venoms for the treatment of five major existing neurological disorders: stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and pathological anxiety.

Introduction

Important ecological advantages are conferred to a diverse range of animals that evolved a finely tuned venom system adapted for predation, defense, and competitor deterrence purposes. From the evolutionary point of view, the prey–predator relationship applies constant selection pressure on toxin efficacy by demanding high specificity and potency for their molecular targets, primarily in the cardiovascular and nervous systems. These features are not commonly found in other natural or synthetic small molecules, making animal toxins extremely valuable as pharmacological tools [1, 2]. Nowadays, many major pharmaceutical companies develop venom-based drug discovery programs or use venom-derived molecules for target validation. Furthermore, there are now several companies focusing on venom-derived therapeutics [2].

A series of venom-derived peptides and proteins are currently in preclinical development while some others are undergoing clinical trials for their applications in the treatment of cancer, chronic pain, congestive heart failure, epilepsy, myocardial infarction, stroke, and multiple sclerosis [13]. Six medications obtained from venom proteins and derivatives – namely captopril (Capoten®), eptifibatide (Integrilin®), tirofiban (Aggrastat®), bivalirudin (Angiomax®), ziconitide (Prialt®), and exenatide (Byetta®) – have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), targeting hypertension, acute coronary syndromes, coagulation during surgery, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes [3]. Nevertheless, novel technologies (i.e.: proteomics approach) have become key components for bioprospecting, unveiling new molecular components in venoms that provide blueprints to treat a wider variety of disorders, such as neurological diseases [4].

Neurological disorders, that encompass, among others, both neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric conditions, have attracted great interest due to their high impact on society [5]. Most of these disorders have a chronic profile, presenting socially disabling conditions for bearers who have their independence, autonomy, freedom, self-image, and self-confidence affected [69]. Furthermore, worldwide life expectancy has risen, favoring an increase in the incidence of age-dependent diseases and the emergence of multiple chronic disorders in the same patient [10].

Even with the increasing search for new treatments, there is still a lack of pharmacological therapies able to efficiently control or interfere in the progression of these ailments [8, 11]. Additionally, currently known pharmacology profiles, in general, tend to be associated with adverse side effects that limit treatment [12, 13]. Considering this dismal panorama for the incipient treatment of the most common neurological disorders, research is underway to unveil new applications of natural products for modern drug discovery processes.

On this aspect, the efficacy of peptides and acylpolyamines isolated from arthropod venoms has attracted growing interest due to their wide range of systemic effects, including the central nervous system (CNS). In the case of the mammalian CNS, arthropod venom compounds may present either analgesic, anxiolytic, antiepileptic or neuroprotective effects, acting as inhibitors or stimulants on specific structures, such as ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, and transporters [1416]. Arthropod neurotoxins also function as agonists or antagonists of metabotropic and ionotropic receptors for neurotransmitters, such as the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate [16]. In this context, this review aims to describe the main compounds found in arthropod venoms that have already been tested for the treatment of the five most prevalent neurological disorders: stroke, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease (PD) and pathological anxiety.

Review

Cerebrovascular disease and pharmacological challenges

Cerebrovascular disease comprises stroke and other complications involving brain blood vessels. This clinical syndrome affects approximately 16.9 million individuals per year worldwide and is the second leading cause of death [17]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defined stroke as a “clinical syndrome of rapid onset of focal (or global, as in subarachnoid hemorrhage) cerebral deficit, lasting more than 24 h (unless interrupted by surgery or death), with no apparent cause other than a vascular one” [18]. However, this concept is now considered obsolete. Recently, a consensus document for an updated definition of stroke for the 21st century was proposed [19]. In summary, according to Sacco et al. [19] “a CNS infarction is defined as brain, spinal cord, or retinal cell death attributable to ischemia, based on neuropathological, neuroimaging, and/or clinical evidence of permanent injury. It also broadly includes intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage.”

Aiming to prevent or minimize brain damage resultant from ischemic cell death, several approaches have focused on potential neuroprotective treatment and/or therapeutic targets for stroke. First, considering that excessive activation of glutamate receptors is involved in brain damage following stroke, both agonist and antagonist of ionotropic glutamate receptors and their effects in exacerbating and attenuating, respectively, the post-hypoxic/ischemic outcome have been evaluated [20]. However, multiple human trials of glutamate synthetic antagonists have failed to indicate effective neuroprotection against stroke whereas side effects associated with this class of compounds have impeded clinical application [21, 22]. In this context, search for new options of non-toxic and effective antagonists has been stimulated.

Glutamate receptor antagonists have been found in arthropod venoms, mostly acylpolyamines, evaluated for alleviating brain damage caused by stroke in preclinical models [14]. Polyamine amide toxins or acylpolyamines are selective non-competitive glutamate receptor (Glu-R) antagonists able to block open channels, serving as a platform to design new drugs for the treatment of stroke in humans. For instance, the small molecule NPS-1506 (delucemine), whose design is based on argiotoxin-636 (acylpolyamine isolated from Argiope aurantia), blocks glutamate receptors of the NMDA-type in neurons, thus preventing excessive Ca2+ influx during ischemia, which produces neuroprotective effects [23]. NPS 1506 also attenuates memory dysfunction and reduces neuronal damage induced in several stroke models [21]. Unfortunately, the use of this drug as a stroke injury reducer has been discontinued in clinical stages. In 2005, the molecule, now called delucemine, was evaluated for use as an antidepressant; however, after successful outcomes in drug development phase I, research on this drug was suspended. Unexpectedly, in 2006, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals acquired intellectual property related to delucemine, and later, apparently, kept the project on hold [24].

Venom from the funnel web spider Agelenopsis aperta contains a mixture of atypical polyamine toxins forming a fraction termed FTX [25, 26]. FTX abolishes Ca2+ action, resulting in plateau potentials, and inhibits voltage-sensitive calcium channel function (VSCC) in adult cerebellar Purkinje cells (P-type channel is the predominant type of Ca2+ channel) [25, 27]. The active component of crude FTX, FTX-3.3, was isolated and its electrophysiological properties studied, showing that it preferentially blocks P-type VSCC, also blocking N-and L-type VSCC [28]. Considering the potential involvement of VSCC in cellular Ca2+loading during ischemic depolarization, these toxins, in modified form, could be useful neuroprotective agents in the case of stroke.

In relation to peptides, toxin PnTx4-3, isolated from venom of the spider Phoneutria nigriventer, interacts with glutamatergic neurotransmission [2931]. Assays performed using rat brain synaptosomes revealed a dose-dependent inhibition of glutamate uptake; however, action studies in animal models for neurological disorders, focused on evaluating the neuroprotective effect have not yet been completed [30].

Two other peptides, PhTx3-3 and PhTx3-4, also isolated from P. nigriventer with neuroprotective action against ischemia neuronal damage, have been purified [32]. These compounds represent broad-spectrum Ca2+ channel blockers able to abolish both the calcium-dependent glutamate release and increase (Ca2+) induced by K+ depolarization from synaptosomes [33]. Importantly, PhTx3 decreases neuronal death and loss of neurotransmission in hippocampus CA1 tested in an in vitro ischemia model [34].

Acidosis has been highlighted as a common feature of ischemia, playing a critical role in brain injury. Acidosis activates Ca2+-permeable acid-sensing-ion channels (ASICs), causing an influx of calcium ions into neurons, thus inducing glutamate receptor-independent, Ca2+−dependent, neuronal injury inhibited by ASIC blockers. This calcium influx can be blocked by PcTX venom obtained from the tarantula Psalmopoeus cambridgei, a specific blocker of the ASIC1a subunit. In the case of focal ischemia, intracerebrovascular (ICV) injection of ASIC1a blockers protects the brain from ischemic injury and apparently does so more potently than glutamate antagonism [22].

Alzheimer’s disease and pharmacological challenges

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a form of dementia characterized by the loss of cognitive function involving memory loss, deficits in comprehension and speech, and a lower capacity for recognizing objects and making plans. Dementia affects 35.6 million people worldwide, wherein AD represents 60-70 % of these cases. The risk of developing AD increases proportionally with age; thus, considering the progressive higher life expectancy, it is estimated that the frequency of cases will double by 2030 and triple by 2050, making AD an important problem of public health [35].

The main pathological hallmark found in AD patients is the presence of amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles of tau protein [36]. Misbalance between production of peptide Aβ, naturally found in neurons, and clearance causes its accumulation and aggregation [37]. In turn, tau protein, also normally found in neurons, can be hyperphosphorylated, aggregating and forming the filamentous structures that ultimately originate the tangles. Due to these neuropathological alterations, neuronal loss occurs, especially in the hippocampus and basal forebrain, as well as synaptic dysfunction and neurotransmitter deficits [38].

Therapeutic approaches remain focused on the symptomatic treatment of the disease, as there is no approved drug able to effectively modify the progression of AD in patients [39, 40]. Unfortunately, pharmacological companies have obtained ineffective results in relation to safety or efficacy in advanced clinical trials [41]. Two classes of symptomatic drugs currently in use are the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine), which increase the availability of acetylcholine at the synaptic cleft, and the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonists (memantine), used to prevent glutamatergic excitotoxicity [42]. These drugs have been tested in patients with mild to moderate AD [41]. Another approach aimed at treating symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate AD include the use of immune globulin intravenous (IGIV 10 %), a biologic agent containing human immunoglobulin IgG antibodies with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties. IGIV binds to oligomeric and amyloid-β fibrils to reverse neurotoxic events in clinical and preclinical settings [43].

Due to this lack of new treatments, natural products may represent an important source of bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential for AD. For instance, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have been isolated from natural products, especially plants [44, 45]. However, few studies have actually focused on exploring arthropod venom compounds for AD, despite their potential against other neurological disorders.

The effect of peptide Tx3-1, a selective blocker of A-type K+ currents (I A ), extracted from spider venom from P. nigriventer, was evaluated in cognitive models in mice. Results showed the ability of the toxin to enhance both short- and long-term memory consolidation in mice tested in the novel object recognition task. Moreover, Tx3-1 restored memory of Aβ25–35-injected mice and exhibited higher potency to improve memory of Aβ25–35-injected mice when compared to control group [46].

Even though it has not been tested yet on specific models of AD, apamin, a stable octadecapeptide isolated from bee Apis mellifera, has been proven an important tool in learning and memory studies as it is considered a blocker of small conductance calcium-activated K+ channels in the CNS. This blockade may enhance the excitability of hippocampal CA1 neurons, lower threshold induction for synaptic plasticity, facilitate hippocampus-dependent memory and long-term potentiation, and enable processes apparently coupled with the post-synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Due to its neurobiological action, apamin has been proposed as a therapeutic agent that could be used to ameliorate cognitive AD symptoms [47].

Epilepsy and pharmacological challenges

Epilepsy is characterized by a persistent predisposition to generate spontaneous epileptic seizures and by the psychological, neurobiological, social, and cognitive consequences associated with it [48, 49]. In relation to treatment, antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy aims to eliminate or reduce seizures to the maximum degree possible, thus decreasing adverse effects, helping patients in maintaining or retrieving their usual activities, and conserving a normal lifestyle [50]. Nevertheless, despite drug availability, approximately 30 % of patients with epilepsy continue to live with uncontrolled seizures. These patients are regarded as therapy-resistant or refractory to the existing AEDs [51].

In this scenario, arthropod venoms may represent an extraordinary source of bioactive molecules that act with selectivity and specificity in the mammalian CNS. This is sustained by a growing number of studies that show its true efficacy in several animal epilepsy models. Such is the case of scorpions that possess venoms with extremely specific and potent peptides that interact specifically with Na+, K+, Cl and Ca2+ ion channels, and also modulate GABAergic neurotransmission [5254].

In 1989, polypeptides isolated from Mesobuthus martensi Karsch (BmK) venom demonstrated antiepileptic activity (BmK-AEP) in a Coriaria lactone-induced epilepsy model [55]. Later, BmK IT2, a β-like neurotoxin (BmK venom subtype) showed antiepileptic activity in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures, decreased the severity of status epilepticus (SE), and suppressed c-Fos expression during SE induced by lithium-pilocarpine [56]. Similarly, from the venom of M. martensi, a sodium channel modulator (BMK AS) exhibited antiepileptic activity by inhibiting PTZ-induced seizures, and reduced the severity of the pilocarpine (PILO) seizures induced by intrahippocampal injection in rats [57]. Additionally, a novel peptide (Cll9) isolated from the venom of Centruroides limpidus limpidus Karsch was tested in rats. Tests showed that when this toxin is injected via ICV, it immediately induces sleep and additionally exerts marked antiepileptic action, preventing signs of penicillin-induced epileptiform activity, suggesting a potentially strong neurodepressant action in mammals [58].

During the last decades, approximately 1700 bioactive candidates have been discovered in spider venoms [24]. Some of these compounds present neuroprotective and antiepileptic effects acting on voltage-sensitive Na+ and Ca2+ channels or on glutamate receptors [52]. The observed effects are attributed to small molecules, found in spider venoms, that present the ability to recognize and antagonize mammalian receptors highly similar to invertebrate receptors, the main target of spiders [59, 60].

Neuroactive effects of polyamine toxins obtained from spiders were first recorded by Kawai et al. in 1982 [61], in the venom of Nephilia clavata. They demonstrated that JSTX blocks glutamatergic synapses in the mammalian brain. Later, Himi et al. [62] demonstrated that JSTX antagonized AMPA-induced seizures with no behavioral toxicity at the effective dosages. Later, JSTX-3 was synthesized and antagonized quisqualate-induced seizures; however, it did not block NMDA or kainic acid (KA)-induced convulsions, suggesting a potential activity on non-NMDA receptors in vertebrate CNS [62].

Argiotoxins identified from the venom of the spider Argiope lobata and other members of the Araneidae family presented neuroprotective action against KA and inhibited cell death mechanisms that involve ionotropic GluR [6365]. Moreover, argiotoxin-636 displayed an antiepileptic effect against NMDA-induced and audiogenic seizures in mice [66]. Other polyaminic compounds also obtained from the venom of the spider A. aperta (AG2) exhibited antiepileptic action by blocking KA-, picrotoxin (PICRO)- and bicuculline (BIC)-induced seizures in rats [67].

Parawixin2 (FrPbAII), a toxin isolated from the venom of Parawixia bistriata spider, has now become a product sold by Santa Cruz Biotechnology [68, 69]. This compound selectively inhibits synaptosomal GABA and glycine reuptake in a dose-dependent manner with little or no effect on monoamine or glutamate transporters [68, 70]. Also, parawixin2 showed protection against PILO-, PICRO-, KA- and PTZ-induced seizures and PTZ-induced kindling [70, 71]. Antiepileptic activity was also identified when parawixin2 was injected into the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) [72].

Similarly, parawixin10 was isolated from the same spider venom and demonstrated protection against KA, NMDA, and PTZ induced seizures in a dose-dependent manner. However, in synaptosomes from rat cerebral cortices it increased L-Glu and glycine uptake, whereas GABA uptake did not change, suggesting high-affinity mediation [73].

A neuroactive fraction obtained from spider Scaptocosa raptorial (SrTx1) also inhibited GABA uptake, further presenting antiepileptic effects in an acute GABAergic model of seizure induction [74]. The SrTx1.3 component from this fraction also protected against BIC-evoked seizures in a dose-dependent manner [75].

Animals submitted to intense sound stimulation were protected from tonic seizures by the administration of ω-agatoxin IVA, a peptide isolated from A. aperta, suggesting that it is able to antagonize NMDA receptor function [76]. Also, from the same spider, agatoxin-489 was able to block KA-induced seizures [77].

Similar to spider venom, the venom from the solitary wasp Philanthus triangulum contains a group of polyamine toxins called philanthotoxins (α-, β-, γ-, δ-PhTx), under investigation since the 1980s due to their remarkable activity in glutamatergic receptors [78, 79]. Furthermore, a neuroprotective and inhibitory effect on neuronal nicotinic Ach receptors has been reported for PhTx toxins and their analogues [8082]. Despite the fact that an antiepileptic activity of these toxins has not been described in an experimental model, their selective antagonism in ionotropic glutamate receptors and possible neuroprotective effect represent at least a possibility that deserves to be further investigated [65].

As to neuroactive peptides from wasp venoms, α-pompilidotoxin (α-PMTX) was isolated from the venom of the solitary wasp Anoplius samariensis. α-PMTX acts mainly on presynaptic terminals by blocking the inactivation of Na+ channels, increasing neurotransmitter release, and enhancing synaptic activity [83]. Nonetheless, it was demonstrated that α-PMTX, when infused in cultured rat cortical neurons synchronously firing, was able to stop synchronous activity. A similar but more potent toxin, called β-pompilidotoxin, was found in the venom of Batozonellus maculifrons solitary wasps and acts to enhance excitatory postsynaptic potentials by reducing the inhibitory potentials in CA1 pyramidal neurons and similarly on Na+ channels of both central and peripheral nervous system [8488]. Considering that slow inactivation kinetics of Na+ currents may thus be of functional significance for epileptogenesis (since it underlies a variety of bioelectric phenomena that culminate in increased neuronal excitability), the capacity of β-PMTX for slowing these inactivation currents raises the hypothesis that it may be a convulsive agent when tested in vivo [89]. So far, these studies have yet to be conducted; however, α- and β-PMTX may represent an important tool for understanding the role of such sodium currents in epileptogenesis.

As to the antiepileptic effects of the low-molecular-weight portion in wasp venoms, toxins from three social wasps from the Polybia genus have been described in the literature. Intracerebrovascular administration of the denatured venom from Polybia ignobilis and Polybia occidentalis were mainly effective against seizures chemically induced by BIC and KA [90, 91]. Later, the ultrafiltered venom of Polybia paulista was tested in a subcutaneous PTZ model, significantly increasing the latency for epileptic seizure onset [92]. Furthermore, a compound with an epileptic activity was isolated from P. paulista venom and subsequently denominated polybioside [93]. Rats received ICV injection of the toxin and presented tonic clonic seizures five minutes after administration, a behavior also observed with peripheric injection demonstrating this toxin’s ability to cross the blood–brain barrier [93].

The effect of the denatured venom of Agelaia vicina in cerebrocortical synaptosomes was described [94]; subsequently, two peptides that act on excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmissions were isolated (AvTx7 and AvTx8) [95, 96]. These works thus corroborate the necessity for more complete studies on the micromolecular fractions of wasp venoms to identify and characterize the components responsible for these notorious antiepileptic effects.

Parkinson’s disease and pharmacological challenges

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative, and chronic pathology that affects the CNS, involving mainly the basal ganglia [97, 98]. Selective neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and the subsequent loss of striatal dopamine content are accepted as the pathological hallmarks for this disorder [13, 99]. Moreover, the presence of eosinophilic inclusion bodies (termed Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, with α-synuclein being the main component) in the cytoplasm of SNc neurons as well as in other regions, and progressive mitochondrial impairment activity, are admittedly involved in the development of PD [100, 101]. Nigrostriatal pathway disruption leads to dopamine deficiency, mainly affecting motor function to cause bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor, and loss of postural stability, among other symptoms [13, 102, 103].

Neurodegenerative disorders, such as PD and AD, have raised great interest due to their impact on society. In the case of PD, the most common treatment strategy involves dopamine replacement with levodopa and dopamine receptor agonists [102]. Even though these treatments can provide dramatic initial improvement, their effects are often short lived, and may cause adverse motor and mental reactions, significantly limiting therapy. Moreover, neither levodopa nor other antiparkinsonian drugs are capable of arresting the progression of the disease and the deterioration of the nigrostriatal system [103]. Thus, considering these limitations, other treatment approaches are clearly needed for the development of new drugs to treat the symptoms, provide neuroprotection, and regenerate lost dopaminergic neurons.

In relation to neuroprotection for PD treatment, arthropod venoms have shown promising results. For instance, social hymenoptera possesses venom with compounds that present affinity and specificity for elements that participate in synaptic transmission in mammals [15, 104]. In this context, bee venom (BV) (also known as apitoxin) from Apis mellifera, when associated with acupuncture, has demonstrated the amazing capacity to interfere in disease progression in rodents with PD induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) [105]. More recently, BV associated with acupuncture also demonstrated promising results in patients with idiopathic PD, showing significant improvement on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale [106].

Similar results were also observed in mice treated with subcutaneous BV injections, demonstrating a potent neuroprotective effect on SNc after MPTP-induced lesion [105, 107]. BV neuroprotective effects were associated with the suppression of microglial activation and a reduction in the infiltration of CD4T cells in an MPTP mouse model for PD [108]. Under pathogenic conditions, microglia, an integrant of the innate immune system in the CNS, are rapidly activated in response to neuronal damage, significantly contributing to secondary neuronal loss [109]. In vitro assays revealed that BV pretreatment increased cell viability and decreased apoptosis, assessed by DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 activity in MPPT-induced cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, demonstrating BV potent anti-apoptotic effect [110]. Thus, BV suppressed neuroinflammatory responses reducing microglial activation, consequently decreasing nitric oxide expression, and preventing apoptosis via PI3K/Akt-mediated signaling pathway [107, 110].

Recently, Dantas et al. [111], when studying the effect of melittin on apomorphine-induced stereotypy, a component that constitutes 40 to 60 % of dry whole honeybee venom, found various biological activities, including high anti-inflammatory effect [112]. Melittin (0.1 mg/kg) and BV (0.1 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg) decreased the number of rotations induced by apomorphine, indicating an interaction of BV components with the dopaminergic system that might benefit the development of new BV-based strategies to treat PD. Protection from neurodegeneration was also observed by BV intraperitoneal injection, showing neuroprotection in a chronic PD model with repeated injection of toxic MPTP. Moreover, the study clearly showed that the neuroprotective effects did not simply restore TH expression in a population of diseased neurons. In the same study, authors evaluated the effect of apamin (peptide isolated from BV, detailed in section “Alzheimer’s disease and pharmacological challenges”) to restore animal motor condition. However, apamin reproduced these protective effects only partially, suggesting that other BV components enhance peptide protective action [113]. Research remains to be performed to elucidate the action mechanisms of these compounds and their potential for future clinical applications [111].

Pathological anxiety and pharmacological challenges

Pathological anxiety corresponds to the most prevalent psychiatric disorder and according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association includes: generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and panic disorders [114]. These disorders are characterized by excessive worrying, uneasiness, apprehension, and fear of future events as a consequence of a complex emotional response. It involves multiple neurotransmitters acting in various receptors within the limbic system and paralimbic regions of the cerebral cortex [114, 115].

Pharmacological therapy for anxiety has evolved through the years and has become more tolerable, available, and numerous. In addition to benzodiazepines, antiepileptics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics have also been used to treat anxiety disorders [115, 116]. Although in recent decades the pharmacological treatment for anxiety disorders has become increasingly more available, there is still a great need to develop new drugs with greater efficacy and tolerability, limited abuse potential, and fewer side effects [116]. In this sense, arthropod venoms may be useful for the development of novel pharmacological tools directed toward the treatment of pathological anxiety.

As previously reported, polyamine toxins belong to a class of neurotoxins widely studied in arthropods venoms. Neurological activity of parawixin2, isolated from the spider P. bistriata, demonstrated anxiolytic effects [68, 72]. This activity was observed in a dose-dependent manner in anxiety models of elevated plus maze and light–dark choice test after acute intrahippocampal injection of parawixin2 in rats. As previously suggested, the action mechanism proposed in this case is the blockade of GABAergic transporters, suggesting that the acute inhibition of the GABAergic transport is capable of causing anxiolytic-like behaviors due to an increase in endogenous GABAergic activity [68, 74, 117].

Some wasp venoms also showed activity in anxiety models or in assays correlated with this analysis. The AvTx8 molecule, isolated from the venom of the social wasp A. vicina, demonstrated its action on neuronal circuits of GABA in the substantia nigra by modulating fear responses evoked by the GABAergic blockade of the superior colliculus, which is a model used in the study of panic disorder [96].

Recently, Couto et al. [92] observed that the peptide fraction LMWC-Pp, obtained from P. paulista venom, presented anxiolytic activity in an elevated plus maze model, increasing the time spent on and the number of entries into the open arms. Yet another interesting finding is that the groups did not differ in relation to the number of entries into the closed arms of the maze. Some studies have shown that the frequency of entries into the closed arms may be an indicator of change in overall motor activity, suggesting that the compound present in the LMWC-Pp has minimal side effects [72, 118].

The scarcity of studies directly correlating neurotoxins from arthropod venoms and anxiety disorders, coupled with the great potential of some molecules elucidated for the treatment of this pathology, reveals a highly promising and still underexplored scientific area.

Conclusions

The high social and financial impact of neurological disorders have prompted an intense search for therapeutic alternatives to the current array of drugs is urgent considering that most of these disorders have an ineffective or only symptomatic treatment. In parallel, considering that working with crude venom material involves many challenges (i.e.: high costs and bioethical issues), recent advances in the fields of bioanalytics and bioinformatics, and innovative approaches to drug discovery based on venomics and proteomics, bring hope to the discovery of new bioactive molecules capable of treating several types of diseases, including neurological disorders. Our review highlighted several promising toxins for the treatment of the top five neurological disorders. Interestingly enough, some of these toxin compounds are already being used as pharmacological tools or are being evaluated for the production of drugs for future clinical use.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Our research group has been supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Federal District Research Foundation (FAPDF).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília

References

  1. Lewis RJ, Garcia ML. Therapeutic potential of venom peptides. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(10):790–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. King GF. Venoms to drugs: translating venom peptides into therapeutics. Aust Biochem. 2013;44(3):13–5.Google Scholar
  3. King GF. Venoms as a platform for human drugs: translating toxins into therapeutics. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2011;11(11):1469–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Santos LD, Pieroni M, Menegasso ARS, Pinto JRAS, Palma MS. A new scenario of bioprospecting of Hymenoptera venoms through proteomic approach. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2011;17(4):364–77.Google Scholar
  5. World Health Organization. Neurological disorders: public health challengers. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  6. De Boer HM, Mula M, Sander JW. The global burden and stigma of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12(4):540–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marcangelo MJ, Ovsiew F. Psychiatric aspects of epilepsy. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007;30(4):781–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen JJ. Parkinson’s disease: health-related quality of life, economic cost, and implications of early treatment. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16 Suppl 1:87–93.Google Scholar
  9. Baker GA, Jacoby A, Buck D, Stalgis C, Monnet D. Quality of life of people with epilepsy. A European Study Epilepsia. 1997;38(3):353–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Singhal S, Khadilkar SV. Neurology in the developing world. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;121:1773–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Youdim MB, Kupershmidt L, Amit T, Weinreb O. Promises of novel multi-target neuroprotective and neurorestorative drugs for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20 Suppl 1:132–6.Google Scholar
  12. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Neuropsychological effects of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs. Lancet. 2001;357(9251):216–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dexter DT, Jenner P. Parkinson disease: from pathology to molecular disease mechanisms. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;62:132–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Estrada G, Villegas E, Corzo G. Spider venoms: a rich source of acylpolyamines and peptides as new leads for CNS drugs. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24(1):145–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortari MR, Cunha AOS, Ferreira LB, Dos Santos WF. Neurotoxins from invertebrates as anticonvulsants: from basic research to therapeutic application. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;114(2):171–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mortari MR, Cunha AOS. New perspectives in drug discovery using neuroactive molecules from the venom of arthropods. In: Baptista GR, editor. An Integrative View of the Molecular Recognit ion and Toxinology - From Analytical Procedures to Biomedical Applications. 2013. p. 91–117.Google Scholar
  17. Mehndiratta P, Smith SC, Worrall BB. Etiologic stroke subtypes: updated definition and efficient workup strategies. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015;17(1):357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bergen DC. Neurological disorders: public health challenges. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):154.Google Scholar
  19. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJB, Culebras A, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shurr A. Neuroprotection against ischemic/hypoxic brain damage: blockers of ionotropic glutamate receptor and voltage sensitive calcium channels. Curr Drug Targets. 2004;5(7):603–18.Google Scholar
  21. Leoni MJ, Chen X, Mueller AL, Cheney J, McIntosh TK, Smith DH. NPS 1506 Attenuates cognitive dysfunction and hippocampal neuron death following brain trauma in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2000;166(2):442–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Xiong Z, Zhu X, Chu X, Minami M, Hey J, Wei W, et al. Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. Cell. 2004;118(6):687–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mueller AL, Artman LD, Balandrin MF, Brady E, Chien YE, Delmar EG, et al. NPS 1506, a novel NMDA receptor antagonist and neuroprotectant. Review of preclinical and clinical studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;890(1):450–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Oldrati V, Bianchi E, Stöcklin R. Spider venom components as drug candidates. In: Nentwig W, editor. Spider Ecophysiology. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 491–503.Google Scholar
  25. Llinas R, Sugimori M, Lin JW, Cherksey B. Blocking and isolation of a calcium channel from neurons in mammals and cephalopods utilizing a toxin fraction (FTX) from funnel-web spider poison. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(5):1689–93.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Blagbrough IS, Moya E. Practical synthesis of the putative polyamine spider toxin FTX: a proposed blocker of voltage-sensitive calcium channels. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35(13):2057–60.Google Scholar
  27. Usowicz M, Sugimori M, Cherksey B, Llinl R. P-type calcium channels in the somata and dendrites of adult cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron. 1992;9(6):1185–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dupere JRB, Moya E, Blagbrough IS, Usowicz MM. Differential inhibition of Ca2+ channels in mature rat cerebellar Purkinje cells by sFTX-3.3 and FTX-3.3. Neuropharmacology. 1996;35(1):1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinheiro ACN, Gomez RS, Massensini AR, Cordeiro MN, Richardson M, Romano-Silva MA, et al. Neuroprotective effect on brain injury by neurotoxins from the spider Phoneutria nigriventer. Neurochem Int. 2006;49(5):543–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliveira LC, De Lima ME, Pimenta AMC, Cordeiro MN, Richardson M, Mansuelle P, et al. PnTx4-3, a new insect toxin from Phoneutria nigriventer venom elicits the glutamate uptake inhibition exhibited by PhTx4 toxic fraction. Toxicon. 2003;42(7):793–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. De Lima ME, Borges MH, Verano-Braga T, Torres FS, Montandon GG, Cardoso FL, et al. Some arachinidan peptides with potential medical application. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis. 2010;16(1):8–33.Google Scholar
  32. Cordeiro MN, Figueiredo SG, Valentim AC, Diniz CR, Von Eickstedt VR, Gilroy J, et al. Purification and amino acid sequences of six Tx3 type neurotoxins from the venom of the Brazilian ‘armed’ spider Phoneutria Nigriventer (keys). Toxicon. 1993;31(1):35–42.Google Scholar
  33. Prado MAM, Guatimosim C, Gomez MV, Diniz CR, Cordeiro MN, Romano-Silva MA. A novel tool for the investigation of glutamate release from rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes: the toxin Tx3-3 from the venom of the spider Phoneutria nigriventer. Biochem J. 1996;314:145–50.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinheiro ACN, Da Silva AJ, Prado MAM, Cordeiro MN, Richardson M, Batista MC, et al. Phoneutria spider toxins block ischemia-induced glutamate release, neuronal death, and loss of neurotransmission in hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2009;19(11):1123–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. World Health Organization. Dementia: a public health priority. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  36. Ross CA, Poirier MA. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Med. 2004;10(Suppl):10–7.Google Scholar
  37. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM. Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(4):329–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298(5594):789–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang Y, Mucke L. Alzheimer mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cell. 2012;148(6):1204–22.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mancuso C, Gaetani S. Preclinical and clinical issues in Alzheimer’s disease drug research and development. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:234.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Clinical trials database. Clinical-Trials.gov. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Search criteria: "Alzheimer's disease"; "dementia"; "neurodegenerative". Accessed 2 April 2015.
  42. Mangialasche F, Solomon A, Winblad B, Mecocci P, Kivipelto M. Alzheimer’s disease: clinical trials and drug development. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(7):702–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Arai H, Ichimuya Y, Shibata N, Nakajima T, Sudoh S, Tokuda T, et al. Safety and tolerability of immune globilin intravenous (human), 10 % solution in Japanese subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Psychogeriatrics. 2014;14:165–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Viegas Jr C, Bolzani VS, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM. New anti-Alzheimer drugs from biodiversity: the role of the natural acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Med Chem. 2005;5(10):915–26.Google Scholar
  45. Orhan IE. Nature: a substantial source of auspicious substances with acetylcholinesterase inhibitory action. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2013;11(4):379–87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gomes GM, Dalmolin GD, Cordeiro MN, Gomez MV, Ferreira J, Rubin MA. The selective A-type K+ current blocker Tx3-1 isolated from the Phoneutria nigriventer venom enhances memory of naïve and Aβ25–35-treated mice. Toxicon. 2013;76:23–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Romero-Curiel A, López-Carpinteyro D, Gamboa C, De La Cruz F, Zamudio S, Flores G. Apamin induces plastic changes in hippocampal neurons in senile Sprague–Dawley rats. Synapse. 2011;65(10):1062–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Fisher RS, Boas WVE, Blume W, Elger C, Genton P, Lee P, et al. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: definitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia. 2005;46(4):470–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fisher RS, Leppik I. Debate: when does a seizure imply epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2008;49 Suppl 9:7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Goldenberg MM. Overview of drugs used for epilepsy and seizures etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pharm Ther. 2010;35(7):392–415.Google Scholar
  51. Bialer M. Chemical properties of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(10):887–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rajendra W, Armugam A, Jeyaseelan K. Neuroprotection and peptide toxins. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2004;45(2):125–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nencioni ALA, Lebrun I, Dorce VAC. A microdialysis study of glutamate concentration in the hippocampus of rats after TsTX toxin injection and blockade of toxin effects by glutamate receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;74(2):455–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Possani LD, Rodríguez De La Vega RC. Scorpion Venom Peptides. In: Kastin AJ, editor. Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides. San Diego: Academic; 2006. p. 339–54.Google Scholar
  55. Wang C, He X, Shao F, Liu W, Ling M, Wang D, et al. Molecular characterization of an anti-epilepsy peptide from the scorpion Buthus martensi Karsch. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268(8):2480–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao R, Zhang XY, Yang J, Weng CC, Jiang LL, Zhang JW, et al. Anticonvulsant effect of BmK IT2, a sodium channel-specific neurotoxin, in rat models of epilepsy. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(5):1116–24.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao R, Weng CC, Feng Q, Chen L, Zhang XY, Zhu HY, et al. Anticonvulsant activity of BmK AS, a sodium channel site 4-specific modulator. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(2):267–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Corona M, Coronas FV, Merino E, Becerril B, Gutiérrez R, Rebolledo-Antunez S, et al. A novel class of peptide found in scorpion venom with neurodepressant effects in peripheral and central nervous system of the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1649(1):58–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. McCormick K, Meinwald J. Neurotoxic acylpolyamines from spider venoms. J Chem Ecol. 1993;19(10):2411–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Saez NJ, Senff S, Yan Er JS, Herzig V, Rash LD, King GF. Spider-venom peptides as therapeutics. Toxins. 2010;2(12):2851–71.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kawai N, Niwa A, Abe T. Spider venom contains specific receptor blocker of glutaminergic synapses. Brain Res. 1982;247(1):169–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Himi T, Saito H, Kawai N, Nakajima T. Spider toxin (JSTX-3) inhibits the convulsions induced by glutamate agonists. J Neural Transm Gem Sect. 1990;80(2):95–104.Google Scholar
  63. Grishin E. Polypeptide neurotoxins from spider venoms. Eur J Biochem. 1999;264(2):276–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rash LD, Hodgson WC. Pharmacology and biochemistry of spider venoms. Toxicon. 2002;40(3):225–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Green AC, Nakanishi K, Usherwood PNR. Polyamine amides are neuroprotective in cerebellar granule cell cultures challenged with excitatory amino acids. Brain Res. 1996;717(1):135–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Jones M, Lodge D. Comparison of some arthropod toxins and toxin fragments as antagonists of excitatory amino acid-induced excitation of rat spinal neurones. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;204(2):203–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Jackson H, Parks TN. Anticonvulsant action of an arylamine-containing fraction from Agelenopsis spider venom. Brain Res. 1990;526(2):338–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Beleboni RO, Guizzo R, Fontana K, Pizzo AB, Oliveira R, Carolino G, et al. Neurochemical characterization of a neuroprotective compound from Parawixia bistriata spider venom that inhibits synaptosomal uptake of GABA and glycine. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(6):1998–2006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Santa Cruz Biotechnology. FrPbAII (L-2-Amino-5-ureidopentanamide). In: Product Block. 2014. http://www.scbt.com/pt/datasheet-221630-frpbaii.html Accessed 8 April 2015.
  70. Gelfuso EA, Cunha AOS, Mortari MR, Liberato JL, Haddad K, Beleboni RO, et al. Neuropharmacological profile of FrPbAII, purified from the venom of the social spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneae, Araneidae), in Wistar rats. Life Sci. 2007;80(6):566–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Gelfuso EA, Liberato JL, Cunha AOS, Mortari MR, Beleboni RO, Lopes NP, et al. Parawixin2, a novel non-selective GABA uptake inhibitor from Parawixia bistriata spider venom, inhibits pentylenetetrazole-induced chemical kindling in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2013;543:12–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Liberato JL, Cunha AOS, Mortari MR, Gelfuso EA, Beleboni RO, Coutinho-Netto J, et al. Anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity of FrPbAII, a novel GABA uptake inhibitor isolated from the venom of the social spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneidae: Araneae). Brain Res. 2006;1124(1):19–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Fachim HA, Cunha AOS, Pereira AC, Beleboni RO, Gobbo-Neto L, Lopes NP, et al. Neurobiological activity of Parawixin 10, a novel anticonvulsant compound isolated from Parawixia bistriata spider venom (Araneidae: Araneae). Epilepsy Behav. 2011;22(2):158–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Cairrão M, Ribeiro AM, Pizzo AB, Beleboni RO, Miranda A, Santos WF. Anticonvulsant and GABA uptake inhibition properties of venom fractions from the spiders Parawixia bistriata and Scaptocosa raptoria. Pharm Biol. 2002;40(6):472–7.Google Scholar
  75. Mussi-Ribeiro A, Miranda A, Gobbo-Netto L, Lopes NP, Dos Santos WF. A anticonvulsive fraction from Scaptocosa raptoria (Araneae: Lycosidae) spider venom. Neurosci Lett. 2004;371(2–3):171–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Jackson HC, Scheideler MA. Behavioural and anticonvulsant effects of Ca2+ channel toxins in DBA/2 mice. Psychopharmacology. 1996;126(1):85–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams K. Effects of Agelenopsis aperta toxins on the n-methyl-d-aspartate receptor: polyamine-like and high-affinity antagonist actions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;266(1):231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Eldefrawi AT, Eldefrawi ME, Konno K, Mansour NA, Nakanishi K, Oltz E, et al. Structure and synthesis of a potent glutamate receptor antagonist in wasp venom. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(13):4910–3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rajasekaran K, Todorovic M, Kapur J. Calcium-permeable AMPA receptors are expressed in a rodent model of status epilepticus. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(1):91–102.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Nakanishi K, Huang X, Jiang H, Liu Y, Fang K, Huang D, et al. Structure-binding relation of philanthotoxins from nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding assay. Bioorg Med Chem. 1997;5(10):1969–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Haghighi AP, Cooper E. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are blocked by intracellular spermine in a voltage-dependent manner. J Neurosci. 1998;18(11):4050–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Strømgaard K, Brier TJ, Andersen K, Mellor IR, Saghyan A, Tikhonov D, et al. Solid-phase synthesis and biological evaluation of a combinatorial library of philanthotoxin analogues. J Med Chem. 2000;43(23):4526–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Konno K, Miwa A, Takayama H, Hisada M, Itagaki Y, Naoki H, et al. Alpha-pompilidotoxin (alpha-PMTX), a novel neurotoxin from the venom of a solitary wasp, facilitates transmission in the crustacean neuromuscular synapse. Neurosci Lett. 1997;238(3):99–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Harsch A, Konno K, Takayama H, Hawai N, Robinson H. Effects of alpha-pompilidotoxin on synchronized firing in networks of rat cortical neurons. Neurosci Lett. 1998;252(1):49–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Yokota H, Tsubokawa H, Miyawaki T, Konno K, Nakayama H, Masuzawa T, et al. Modulation of synaptic transmission in hippocampal CA1 neurons by a novel neurotoxin (beta-pompilidotoxin) derived from wasp venom. Neurosci Res. 2001;41(4):365–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Miyawaki T, Tsubokawa H, Yokota H, Oguro K, Katsuhiro K, Toshio M, et al. Differential effects of novel wasp toxin on rat hippocampal interneurons. Neurosci Lett. 2002;328(1):25–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Kawai N, Konno K. Molecular determinants of two neurotoxins that regulate sodium current inactivation in rat hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2004;361(1–3):44–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Magloire V, Czarnecki A, Anwander H, Streit J. β-Pompilidotoxin modulates spontaneous activity and persistent sodium currents in spinal networks. Neuroscience. 2011;172:129–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Köhling R. Voltage-gated sodium channels in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2002;43(11):1278–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Mortari MR, Cunha AO, Oliveira L, Vieira EB, Gelfuso EA, Coutinho-Netto J, et al. Anticonvulsant and behavioural effects of the denatured venom of the social wasp Polybia occidentalis (Polistinae, Vespidae). Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;97(5):289–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Cunha AOS, Mortari MR, Oliveira L, Carolino ROG, Coutinho-Netto J, Dos Santos WF. Anticonvulsant effects of the wasp Polybia ignobilis venom on chemically induced seizures and action on GABA and glutamate receptors. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005;141(1):50–7.Google Scholar
  92. Couto LL, Dos Anjos LC, Araújo MAF, Mourão CA, Schwartz CA, Ferreira LB, et al. Anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity of the peptide fraction isolated from the venom of the social wasp Polybia paulista. Pharmacogn Mag. 2012;8(32):292–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Saidemberg DM, Silva-Filho LC, Tognoli LMM, Tormena CF, Palma MS. Polybioside, a neuroactive compound from the venom of the social wasp: Polybia paulista. J Nat Prod. 2010;73(4):527–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Pizzo AB, Fontana CK, Ribeiro AM, Miranda A, Coutinho-Netto J, Dos Santos WF. Characterization of the actions of avtx 7 isolated from Agelaia vicina (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) wasp venom on synaptosomal glutamate uptake and release. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2004;18(2):61–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Pizzo AB, Fontana K, Coutinho-Netto J, Dos Santos WF. Effects of the crude venom of the social wasp Agelaia vicina on gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate uptake in synaptosomes from rat cerebral cortex. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2000;14(2):88–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. de Oliveira L, Cunha AO, Mortari MR, Pizzo AB, Miranda A, Coimbra NC, et al. Effects of microinjections of neurotoxin AvTx8, isolated from the social wasp Agelaia vicina (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) venom, on GABAergic nigrotectal pathways. Brain Res. 2005;1031(1):74–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Henchcliffe C. An update on Parkinson’s disease. Amer Acad Neurol Inst. 2013;1–17.Google Scholar
  98. Politis M, Niccolini F. Serotonin in Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:136–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Braak H, Braak E. Pathoanatomy of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2000;247(Suppl II):3–10.Google Scholar
  100. Gallegos S, Pacheco C, Peters C, Opazo CM, Aguayo LG. Features of alpha-synuclein that could explain the progression and irreversibility of Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:59.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Abou-Sleiman PM, Muqit MMK, Wood NW. Expanding insights of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parskinson’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(3):207–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(4):368–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Mandel S, Grünblatt E, Riederer P, Gerlach M, Levites Y, Youdim MBH. Neuroprotective strategies in Parkinson’s disease an update on progress. CNS Drugs. 2003;17(10):729–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Monteiro MC, Romão PRT, Soares AM. Pharmacological perspectives of wasp venom. Protein Pept Lett. 2009;16(8):944–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Doo AR, Kim ST, Kim SN, Moon W, Yin CS, Chae Y, et al. Neuroprotective effects of bee venom pharmaceutical acupuncture in acute 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine- induced mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Res. 2010;32(Suppl I):88–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Cho SY, Shim SR, Young HY, Park HJ, Jung WS, Moon SK, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture and bee venom acupuncture in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18(8):948–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Kim JI, Yang EJ, Lee MS, Kim YS, Huh Y, Cho IH, et al. Bee venom reduces neuroinflammation in the MPTP-induced model of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 2011;121(4):209–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Chung ES, Kim H, Lee G, Park S, Kim H, Bae H. Neuro-protective effects of bee venom by suppression of neuroinflammatory responses in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: role of regulatory T cells. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(8):1322–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. González-Scarano F, Baltuch G. Microglia as mediators of inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22(1):219–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Doo AR, Kim ST, Kim SN, Park JY, Chung SH, Choe BY, et al. Bee venom protects SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells from 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced apoptotic cell death. Brain Res. 2012;1429:106–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Dantas CG, Nunes TLGM, Nunes TLGM, Paixão AO, Reis FP, Júnior WL, et al. Pharmacological evaluation of bee venom and melittin. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2014;24(1):67–72.Google Scholar
  112. Son DJ, Lee JW, Lee YH, Song HS, Lee CK, Hong JT. Therapeutic application of anti-arthritis, pain-releasing, and anti-cancer effects of bee venom and its constituent compounds. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;115(2):246–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Alvarez-Fischer D, Noelker C, Vulinović F, Grünewald A, Chevarin C, Klein C, et al. Bee Venom and its component apamin as neuroprotective agents in a Parkinson disease mouse model. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4), e61700.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  115. Durant C, Christmas D, Nutt D. The pharmacology of anxiety. In: Stein MB, Steckler T, editors. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. 2nd ed. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 303–30.Google Scholar
  116. Gelfuso EA, Rosa DS, Fachin AL, Mortari MR, Cunha AOS, Beleboni RO. Anxiety: a systematic review of neurobiology, traditional pharmaceuticals and novel alternatives from medicinal plants. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;543:150–65.Google Scholar
  117. Schmitt U, Lüddens H, Hiemke C. Anxiolytic-like effects of acute and chronic GABA transporter inhibition in rats. J Neural Transm. 2002;109(5–6):871–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Cruz AP, Frei F, Graeff FG. Ethopharmacological analysis of rat behavior on the elevated plus-maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994;49(1):171–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Monge-Fuentes et al. 2015