Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

4-Phenyl-1,3-thiazole-2-amines as scaffolds for new antileishmanial agents

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3 and
  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases201824:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-018-0163-x

  • Received: 26 April 2018
  • Accepted: 28 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

There is still a need for new alternatives in pharmacological therapy for neglected diseases, as the drugs available show high toxicity and parenteral administration. That is the case for the treatment of leishmaniasis, particularly to the cutaneous clinical form of the disease. In this study, we present the synthesis and biological screening of eight 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amines assayed against Leishmania amazonensis. Herein we propose that these compounds are good starting points for the search of new antileishmanial drugs by demonstrating some of the structural aspects which could interfere with the observed activity, as well as suggesting potential macromolecular targets.

Methods

The compounds were easily synthesized by the methodology of Hantzsch and Weber, had their purities determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass spectrometry and assayed against the promastigote forms of Leishmania amazonensis as well as against two white cell lines (L929 and THP-1) and the monkey’s kidney Vero cells. PrestoBlue® and MTT viability assays were the methodologies applied to measure the antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities, respectively. A molecular modeling target fishing study was performed aiming to propose potential macromolecular targets which could explain the observed biological behavior.

Results

Four out of the eight compounds tested exhibited important anti-promastigote activity associated with good selectivity indexes when considering Vero cells. For the most promising compound, compound 6, IC50 against promastigotes was 20.78 while SI was 5.69. Compounds 3 (IC50: 46.63 μM; SI: 26.11) and 4 (IC50: 53.12 μM; SI: 4.80) also presented important biological behavior. A target fishing study suggested that S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase is a potential target to these compounds, which could be explored to enhance activity and decrease the potential toxic side effects.

Conclusions

This study shows that 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amines could be good scaffolds to the development of new antileishmanial agents. The S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase could be one of the macromolecular targets involved in the action.

Keywords

  • 2-aminothiazoles
  • Antikinetoplastids
  • Antileishmanial
  • Cutaneous
  • Target fishing

Background

Neglected diseases affect thousands of people, predominantly in developing countries [1]. The available pharmacological therapies, however, are far from satisfactory, since the existing drugs exhibit a moderate efficacy associated with toxicity. This is the case of leishmaniasis, a tropical endemic disease caused by protozoa of the genus Leishmania [2]. The most common leishmaniasis treatments frequently require parenteral administration and chronic therapeutic schemes, which result in high costs and low accessibility to the farthest endemic regions [3]. For these reasons, the need for new alternatives to treat neglected diseases remains urgent.

The 2-aminothiazole scaffold is present in the structure of antiviral [4], antifungal [5], antimicrobial [6], anti-cancerous [7], and anti-inflammatory compounds [8]. Recent papers have reported different 2-aminothiazole derivatives as promising agents against kinetoplastids such as Trypanosoma cruzi, Trypanosoma brucei, Leishmania donovani, and Leishmania infantum [911].

Kaiser et al. screened a set of 400 drug-like compounds from the chemical library known as “Malaria Box”, made available by the Medicines for Malaria Venture initiative, for potential repurposing of these compounds as antikinetoplastids. Their findings showed that 2-aminothiazole derivatives might be potential hits to be explored against trypanosomatids, specifically against Trypanosomes [9].

More recently, Papadopoulou et al. synthesized a small series of 5-nitro-2-aminothiazoles derivatives which presented better antitrypanosomal activity than the standard drug benznidazole. Antileishmanial activity was also observed in some of the derivatives; however, toxicity against L6 cells was also verified [10].

The 2-aminothiazole ring has gained increasing attention as an antiprotozoal hit. Nevertheless, the 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazole-2-amine scaffold alone has never been explored by its biological potential, mainly regarding the antileishmanial activity.

In this paper, we report the synthesis and biological screening of eight 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amines assayed against L. amazonensis, a species of leishmania from the L. mexicana complex, which is responsible for the cutaneous form of the disease. The compounds were also explored as to assess their cytotoxicity, selectivity index, and potential macromolecular targets.

The main objective of these studies was to understand whether 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amines could be good starting points in the search for new antileishmanial drugs, as well as to assess the chemical aspects that could interfere with the activity. Potential macromolecular targets, which could explain the observed actions, were also investigated by target fishing approach.

Methods

Eight different aromatic ketones were applied in accordance with their 4-phenyl ring substituent, considering their effect on the lipophilicity of the system (Table 1).
Table 1

The 4-Phenyl-1,3-thiazol-4-amines series

Compound

R

CLogPa

MRb

Yield %

01

H

2.61

50.20

61

02

4-CH3

3.07

55.25

72

03

4-CH2CH3

3.47

59.85

59

04

3,4-Cl

3.64

59.81

53

05

4-CF3

3.49

56.18

18

06

4-C(CH3)3

4.23

68.87

27

07

4-OH

2.32

52.19

47

08

4-Cl

3.12

55.01

67

(a) Calculated n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient; (b) Molar Refractivity

Synthesis

The 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazoles were synthesized according to the methodology of Hantzsch and Weber [12], from their respective arylketones and thiourea (1:2), in the presence of iodine (4 equivalents), by heating the mixture for 4 h. At the end of the reaction, hot water was added to the raw mixture, which was cooled to room temperature and washed with three portions of ethyl ether (~ 10 mL each) to remove the residual iodine. The water phase was neutralized with a saturated solution of ammonium hydroxide and washed with distilled water to yield a solid isolated by filtration under reduced pressure. The pure 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amines were obtained by crystallization from Ethanol:water (4:1) solution [13].

Antileishmanial assay

All compounds were assayed against promastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis (MHOM/BR/1973/M2269). Promastigotes were grown in 199 media (Sigma, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) of fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin (10,000 UI/mL)/streptomycin (10.0 mg/mL) (Sigma, USA). The parasites were collected at log phase, they were counted at the Neubauer chamber, their concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 cell/mL, and their cells were seeded at a 96-wells plate. The 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazoles were added to the culture, considering concentrations ranging from 3.2 to 142 μM. Compounds were diluted in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (25 mg/mL) and diluted in 199 media to generate a 1% DMSO starting solution of each test compound. Positive control with no compounds and DMSO control were considered at the assay. All plates were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h, and PrestoBlue® vital dye was added to the wells.

Viability was accessed with PrestoBlue® (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reagent was added in each well (10 μL) and plates incubated for 2 h. Then, plates were read on a microplate reader (PowerWave HT, Biotek) with excitation/emission 560/590 nm (nm). The relative fluorescence units were used to generate the quantitative results. All compounds were analyzed as duplicates, and the parameters to calculate IC50 were obtained by GraphPad Prism, version 5.0. IC50 values were determined by the Hill equation rearranged [14].
$$ {\mathrm{LogIC}}_{50}={\mathrm{logEC}}_{50}-\left\{\log \left(\mathrm{Top}-\mathrm{Bottom}/\mathrm{Y}-\mathrm{Bottom}-1\right)/\mathrm{HillSlope}\right\} $$

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity was measured in L929 and THP1 cell lines using PrestoBlue®Cell Viability Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Invitrogen) as described by Lall et al. with modifications [15]. First, cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin). Cell cultures were grown and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Then, L929 cells were seeded in 96-wells flat microtiter plate at a concentration of 1 × 105cells/mL (100 μL/well). To THP-1 cells, cultures were differentiated into macrophages by adding 50 ng/mL 12-myristate 13-acetate phorbol (PMA) (Calbiochem, San Diego, USA) in RPMI-free FBS. After 24 h of culturing, the adhered cells were washed with PBS and RPMI with 10% FBS were added. Both cell lines were treated with 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazoles at concentrations ranging from 3.2 to 142 μM. The plates were incubated for 48 h and, thereafter, 20 μL/well PrestoBlue® was added. The plates were incubated for further 2 h and the fluorescence was read at bottom using 540–570 nm excitation and 580–610 nm emission. The average of the fluorescence values of the control wells (medium plus PrestoBlue®) was subtracted from the fluorescence value of the positive controls (cells, medium, and PrestoBlue®) and from each experimental well (cells, medium, compounds and PrestoBlue®).

Cytotoxicity was also evaluated using Vero cells, a monkey kidney cell line obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CCL-81; Manassas, VA). The cytotoxicity was determined by the 3-(4,5dimethylthiazol- 2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method according to a previously described procedure [16, 17].

In all cases, the CC50 was calculated as described as in the Antileishmanial assay Section.

Selectivity index calculation

Selectivity indexes (SI) were calculated by dividing CC50 against each mammalian cell line by the IC50 against L. amazonensis (CC50/IC50).

Structure-activity relationship studies

Regarding the studies of the structure-activity relationship, both the partition coefficient and the molar refractivity (CLogP and MR, respectively) were calculated with Marvin Sketch 6.2.2 software [18]. Electronic parameters, such as punctual Mulliken charges and dipole moment values, were calculated to the minimum energy conformer obtained after geometry optimization processing at Gaussian 09 W software. Electrostatic potential charges (ChelpG) were calculated by the ab initio method HF/6-31 g* (Gaussian 09 W) and mapped on the Connolly surface of each molecule [19]. PaDel-descriptor calculator was used to obtain the topological indexes [20]. Only qualitative structure-activity relationship studies were performed, as well as only the linear correlation coefficients above 0.8 were taken into consideration.

Target fishing and docking studies

Target fishing studies were performed applying the Web-based Software Pharmmapper [21], considering the 3D-optimized structure of the 4-phenyl-1,3-thiazole-2-amines and the ChelpG charges as the input files. The best 300 results were analyzed based on their fit and z’score functions.

The docking protocol was established after performing redocking studies with the crystallographic data retrieved from Protein Data Bank, entry code 1CG6 (resolution: 1.7 Å), using the Gold 5.4.1 software [22]. This protocol was applied to the docking simulation with the test compounds, mainly to the 6 one, the best compound of the series. The binding site was defined by the centroid between Met196 and Asp220 and considering a region of 14 Å around this point. Ten runs with 10 solutions each were performed to generate a set of 100 complexes, which were examined by the incidence of a recurrent pose as well as by their Goldscore and Chemscore values.

Results

Synthesis

The compounds were synthesized and isolated as solids of good purity and yields. Structural characterization of these compounds was performed by 1H-/13C-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Infrared spectra (IR). Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was performed to verify the purity, as well as, the structure of the analogues. All compounds presented purities varying from 98 to 100% and molecular ion values (m/z) and fragmentation patterns correspondent to what was expected for each molecule (Additional file 1).

Compound 1 was obtained as a pale yellow powder (61%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=7.00 (s, 1H, H5); 7.05 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.24 (t, 1H, J1 = 6 Hz, J2 = 9 Hz, H13); 7.35 (t, 2H, J1 = 6 Hz, J2 = 9 Hz, H9 and H11); 7.79 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H8 and H12); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=101.94 (C5); 125.99 (C8, and C12); 127.62 (C9, C10 and C11); 128.91 (C4); 135.40 (C2); IR (KBr): 3436 (νassNH2); 3254 (νsimNH2); 3155 (νC-H aromatic); 1599 (νC=N), 715 (νC-S-C); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 14.10 (100); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) m/z calculated for C9H8N2S 176.23, found 176.

Compound 2 was obtained as a pale yellow powder (72%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=2.29 (s, 3H, CH3); 6.91 (s, 1H, H5); 7.01 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.16 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz, H9a and H11); 7.67 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H8 and H12); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=21.25 (C13); 101.01(C5); 125.93 (C7); 129.48 (C8 and C12); 132.76 (C9 and C11); 136.81 (C10); 150.36 (C4); 168.53 (C2); IR (KBr): 3454 (νassNH2); 3300 (νsimNH2); 3117 (νC-H aromatic); 2954 (νC-H CH3); 1537 (νC=N), 731 (νC-S-C); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 15,46 (100); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) m/z calculated for C10H10N2S 190.26, found 190.

Compound 3 was obtained as a dark yellow powder (59%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=1.18 (t, 3H, J1 = 9 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, CH3 ethyl); 2.59 (q, 2H, J1 = 9 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, CH2 ethyl); 6.91 (s, 1H, H5); 7.01 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H9 and H11); 7.69 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H8 and H12); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=15.97 (C14); 28.35 (C13); 101.06 (C5); 126.00 (C7); 128.27 (C9 and C11); 133.00 (C8 and C12); 143.17 (C10); 150.36 (C4); 168.54 (C2); IR (KBr): 3425 (νassNH2); 3265 (νsimNH2); 3116 (νC-H aromatic); 2958 (νC-H CH3); 2870 (νC-H CH2);1516 (νC=N); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 16,54 (100); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) MS m/z calculated for C11H12N2S 204.29, found 204.

Compound 4 was obtained as a white powder (53%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=7.14 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.22 (s, 1H, H5); 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, H12); 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, H11); 8.01 (d, 1H, J = 3 Hz, H8); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=104.27 (C5); 126.00 (C12); 127.60 (C7); 129.72 (C8); 131.17 (C11); 131.74 (C9 and C10); 135.88 (C4); 147.65 (C2); IR (KBr): 3446 (νassNH2); 3282 (νsimNH2); 3124 (νC-H aromatic); 1527 (νC=N); 1022 and 1041(νC-Cl); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 18,96 (97,8); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) MS m/z calculated for C9H6Cl2N2S 245.13, found 244.

Compound 5 was obtained as a pale yellow powder (18%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=7.18 (s, 1H, NH2); 7.26 (S, 1H, H5); 7.73 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H8 and H12); 8.00 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H9 and H 11); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=104.84 (C5); 125.89 (C9and C11); 126.46 (C8 and C12); 127.45 (C10); 127.98 (C7); 138.95 (C13); 151.47 (C4); 168.96 (C2); IR (KBr): 3479 (νassNH2); 3298 (νsimNH2); 3143 (νC-H aromatic); 1537 (νC=N); 754 (νC-F); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 14,13 (100); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) MS m/z calculated for C10H7F3N2S 244.24, found 244.

Compound 6 was obtained as a pale yellow powder (27%): mp: 227-230 °C; 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=1.29 (s, 9H, H14, H15and H16); 6.91 (s, 1H, H5); 7.02 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.37 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H8 and H12); 7.70 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, H9 and H11). Melting point: Experimental (227-230 °C); Reference (228-230 °C). 13C-NMR, IR and GC-MS acquisitions not performed.

Compound 7 was obtained as a pale yellow powder (47%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=6.74–6.69 (m, 3H, H5, H8and H12); 6.92 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.60–7.55 (m, 2H, H9 and H11); 9.42 (s, 1H, H13); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=98.87 (C5); 115.60 (C9 and C11); 127.35 (C7); 150.57 (C8 and C12); 157.19 (C10); 168.41 (C4); 206.96 (C2); IR (KBr): 3487 (νassNH2); 3377 (νsimNH2); 3126 (νC-H aromatic); 2984 (νO-H); 1535 (νC=N); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 17,69 (100); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) MS m/z calculated for C9H8N2OS 192.24, found 192.

Compound 8 was obtained as a white powder (67%): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=7.07 (s, 1H, H5); 7.08 (s, 2H, NH2); 7.39–7.44 (m, 2H, H8 and H9); 7.83–7.79 (m, 2H, H9 and H11); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, [D6] DMSO, ppm): δ=102.77 (C5); 127.69 (C7); 128.93 (C9 and C11); 131.98 (C8 and C12); 134.23 (C10); 143.05 (C4); 168.81 (C2); IR (KBr): 3437 (νassNH2); 3282 (νsimNH2); 3109 (νC-H aromatic); 1533 (νC=N); 826 (νC-Cl); GC (retention time, relative intensity in %): 16,50 (99,6); LRMS (EI, 70 eV) MS m/z calculated for C9H7ClN2S 210.68, found 210.

Biological assays

All compounds were tested against L. amazonensis promastigotes. The cytotoxicity was also assessed against L929 and THP-1 by using the PrestoBlue® cell viability reagent, as well as against Vero cell lines by using the MTT viability assay. The results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

IC50 values against L. amazonensis promastigotes and the cytotoxicity assay results, expressed as CC50 values

Compound

IC50 (μM)

pIC50

CC50 (μM) THP1 cellsa)

SI

CC50 (μM) L929 cellsb)

SI

CC50 (μM) VERO cellsc)

SI

1

957.56

3.02

143.57

0.15

198.26

0.20

710.06

0.74

2

107.68

3.97

135.40

1.26

159.52

1.48

657.51

6.11

3

46.63

4.33

117.27

2.51

95.45

2.05

1217.5

26.11

4

53.12

4.27

84.65

1.59

121.12

2.28

255.03

4.80

5

53.37

4.27

92.21

1.73

106.08

2.00

511.76

9.59

6

20.78

4.68

45.73

2.20

27.07

1.30

118.17

5.69

7

inactive

inactive

inactive

ND

Inactive

ND

651.29

ND

8

115.95

3.94

82.15

0.70

115.06

0.99

595.94

5.14

Amphotericin B

16.23

ND

ND

ND

Pentamidine

10.76

ND

ND

ND

 (a) THP1 cells: human monocytic cell line derived from acute monocytic leukemia patients; (b) L929 cells: fibroblasts from subcutaneous connective tissue; c) Vero cells: kidney epithelial cells extracted from African green monkeys. IC50: Half-maximal inhibitory concentration on promastigotes; pIC50: Half-maximal inhibitory concentration in log units; CC50: Half cytotoxic concentration; SI: Selectivity Indexes, ND: Not determined. pIC50 calculates as pIC50 = −log10 (IC50)

Structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling studies

Structure-activity relationship analyses revealed a good parabolic correlation between CLogP and antileishmanial activity (Additional file 2A), with a correlation coefficient of 0.968. The same behavior was also observed when regarding the Molar Refractivity (MR) values of the compounds, a parameter which also describes molecular hydrophobicity associated to molecular volume (Additional file 2B).

No significant correlation (r2 = > 0.8) was found between activity and electronic parameters, such as electrostatic potential charges, punctual charges or dipole moments (see Additional file 3 to verify the parameters and Additional file 4 for electrostatic potential maps).

However, some relationships could be observed regarding the Electrostatic Potential Maps. Compounds 3 and 6, for instance, showed a green left-side region (Additional file 4) whereas compounds 4 and 5, which presented an intermediary activity, exhibited a yellowish left-side region similarly to the one observed with compound 7, an inactive analogue. These findings could reveal some potential influence of the electronic distribution on the activity, although further studies must be performed to confirm these relationships.

As the cytotoxic effects on Vero cells were substantially different from those obtained against L. amazonensis, L-929 and THP-1 cells, a target fishing study was proposed to suggest potential targets and, consequently, mechanisms which could explain these observations.

The web-based software Pharmmapper was applied to search pharmacophore databases, such as the Target Bank, Drug Bank, Binding DB, and Potential Drug Target Database. Such software also takes advantage of a normalized score function, the z’score, to present the most probable targets to compounds with defined chemical structures [21].

The energetically optimized structure of each compound, considering their ChelpG charges, was employed as input, and the best 300 targets – human and non-human – were retrieved. Table 3 lists the five best targets common to these compounds, along with the maximum z’score values that were obtained.
Table 3

Pharmmapper results

Target

PDB Code

Ligand Compounds

Max z’score valuea

Function

S-Methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase

1CG6

All derivatives

3.69

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

Adenosine deaminase

1 V79/1 V89

All but compound 3

4.72

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

UvrABC System Protein B

1C40

All but compound 4

3.59

Replication, recombination, and repair

Dihydrofolate reductase

1IA2

All but compound 4

3.12

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

Queuine t-RNA-ribosyltransferase

1Q66

All but compounds 3 and 4

3.02

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

(a) among all compounds tested

The human S-Methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase was elected as the best potential target, based in two criteria: the best Max z’score values found to each compound under analysis combined to the fact that this target was returned to all compound submitted to the target fishing.

A BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, National Center for Biotechnology Information) search was, then, performed to find homologous proteins in the L. amazonensis available proteome [23]. The best nine results are listed in Table 4, together with the statistical analyses which corroborate their significance.
Table 4

BLAST results for Leishmania sp protein sequences producing significant alignment with human S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase

Target

Max Score

Total Score

Query Cover (%)

E value

Identity (%)

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [Leishmania infantum JPCM 5]

182

182

87

2e-55

38

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [L. major strain Friedlin]

180

180

87

1e-54

38

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [L. guyanensis]

182

182

95

3e-55

37

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [L. mexicanaMHOM/GT/2001/U1103]

182

182

95

2e-55

37

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [L. panamensis]

179

179

95

2e-54

37

Putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase [L. brasiliensis MHOM/BR/75/M2904]

179

179

95

2e-54

37

Identity values above 35% were observed for the Leishmania species enzymes, so a docking study considering the human enzyme was also performed to elucidate the potential binding mode of the compounds into the catalytic site. The results are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Docking at the S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase. (a) Co-crystallized ligand. (b) Compound 6 docked at the active site. Blue dashed lines: pi-stacking interactions; black dashed lines: hydrogen bonds (For color version, please access the online version of the article)

Discussions

The compounds were obtained as expected with good yields and purities. The fact of the easy synthetic preparation constitutes one of the major advantages for the future application of these analogues as biological agents, mainly regarding the therapeutics of neglected diseases.

Out of the eight tested analogues, four of them showed activity against the promastigotes of L. amazonensis (Table 2), within the range of 20 to 60 μM. Compound 6 was the most active one (21 μM), exhibiting an IC50 value close to the one obtained with the standard drug of the assay, the Amphotericin B (16.23 μM). Compound 3 was the second best of the series, followed by Compounds 4 and 5, both presenting very similar antileishmanial behavior. However, no compound was better than the pentamidine standard drug (10.76 μM).

Even though compounds that were more active against leishmaniasis have been reported in literature, our results are still encouraging because the antileishmanial activity was verified solely considering this scaffold.

A suitable cytotoxic profile was obtained to compound 6 when considering the THP-1 cells, with a selectivity index of 2.20, but this index was lower when considering L929 cells (1.30). The THP-1 cell line is a frequent model for imitating the function and regulation of macrophages, the host cells of L. amazonensis.

Similarly, Compounds 3, 4 and 5 exhibited selectivity indexes suitable to proceed to the next steps of the development, since the toxic dose was about two times higher than the effective dose, both when considering L929 and THP-1 cells. Moreover, no cytotoxic effect was observed against Vero cells at the same concentration range tested, except for compound 1, which had a SI of 0.74. This last compound was inactive against L. amazonensis, though.

These observations encouraged us to proceed with further studies, aiming to understand which of the structural aspects could be related to the activity or cytotoxicity of the compounds.

CLogP values ranging from 3.5 to 4.5 seem to be ideal to the biological activity of the series observed. Moreover, molar refractivity (MR) also presented a good correlation with antileishmanial activity (Additional file 2), indicating that not just the lipophilicity contributes to the antileishmanial activity, but also molar volume and polarizability.

The observed relations with hydrophobic, volume, and polarizability parameters strongly suggest the importance of membrane permeation to the activity of these scaffolds.

Such findings are also in accordance with the observations of Papadopoulou et al., in which linear correlation coefficients of 0.979 and 0.977 were found between the antitrypanosomal activity and the CLogP values of their piperazine and non-piperazine derivatives [10]. Their results against L. donovani are significant and have also demonstrated good correlation with the lipophilicity of their analogues (r2 = 0.886). These compounds, however, presented cytotoxicity toward L6 cells, which were also related to the lipophilicity.

Aiming to explain the differential cytotoxic profile observed among the eukaryotic cells, molecular modeling studies were also performed.

Initially, a target fishing study was carried out to identify potential targets to the compounds. Most of the returned targets are related to nucleotide recognition, processing, transport, and/or metabolism. This could indicate structural similarity between the scaffold and these endogenous substrates. It also could explain, to some degree, the observed cytotoxicity toward some of the tested cell lines.

The single common target to all tested compounds was the S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase (1CG6, pdb entry). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine in adenine and 5-methylthio-D-ribose-1-phosphate in a fundamental step of the polyamine biosynthesis [24]. This pathway is essential to the production of nucleotides and, therefore, essential to cell growth and proliferation.

Unfortunately, the phosphorylase isoform pointed out as a target to these compounds is the human one, and it would not be able to explain the antileishmanial action observed. However, this enzyme has its correspondent isoform in several living organisms.

Investigation for potential Leishmania sp isoforms was performed with the BLAST. The search found nine protein sequences with identity values ranging from 37 to 38%, all from different Leishmania species, including one from the L. mexicana complex. The Expectation values (E-values) of 10− 54 obtained in this study corroborates with the significance of the alignment, since the lower the E-value, the more significant the alignment and its scores (Table 4).

Most of the conserved residues are located at the binding site region, as revealed by the alignment of the putative L. mexicana phosphorylase and the human isoform (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

(a) Human and (b) L. Mexicana S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase binding site alignment

The binding mode of 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine on the human isoform is sustained by three main hydrogen-bound interactions with the Met196, Asp220 and Asp222. The alignment with the enzyme from L. mexicana showed that these residues are conserved at the binding site, corresponding to the Met200, Asp224 and Asp226.

This similarity could be the basis for the cytotoxicity observed toward the L929 fibroblasts and THP-1 cells, but not toward the Vero cells, which is a S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase negative cell line [25].

In the absence of crystallographic data from the L. mexicana enzyme, docking studies with the human isoform were performed to verify the potential binding mode of the 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazole to the phosphorylase (Fig. 1).

The most prevalent pose of compound 6 at the phosphorylase binding site was found at 89% frequency. This pose showed values 43.34Goldscore and 18.93 Chemscore, which are compatible with the good fitness of compound 6 at the binding site.

The docked compound 6 also showed good correspondence with the binding mode exhibited by the 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine, the original ligand of the phosphorylase.

The amino group of 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazole compound 6 (Fig. 1b) established hydrogen bonds, as a donor, with the Asp220 and Asp222 residues, just like observed for the co-crystallized ligand (Fig. 1a). Compound 6 also positioned its aromatic systems suitably to establish pi-stacking interactions with Phe117, which, once more, mimics the 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine binding mode. The tert-butyl group from the 4-phenyl ring was positioned close to a set of hydrophobic residues, Thr18, Pro69 and Val231, occupying the same site of the methylthio moiety from the co-crystallized ligand. Conversely, no interaction between compound 6 and Met196 was observed.

Compounds 3, 4 and 5 were also theoretically docked to the phosphorylase and exhibited the same pattern of interactions described above when regarding their most frequent poses, 96%, 94% and 100%, respectively (Additional file 5).

Literature on S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase expression in different cell lines reports that almost all non-neoplastic mammal cells express this enzyme [2628]. Most of the S-methyl-5-thioadenosine phosphorylase lacking cells are malignant cells, as discussed by Kamatani et al. [29].

Even though these studies were performed taking the human enzyme into consideration, the results could be used as a guide to future design new antileishmanial compounds. For instance, homology modeling studies can be useful in order to improve such studies.

Derivatives of 2-aminothiazoles have been reported as predominantly active against trypanosomes, such as in the case of Kaiser et al., but they have not shown expressive activity against leishmanias. Nearly all literature reports are based on studies with L. donovani or L. infantum, both responsible for the visceral leishmaniasis, since this is the lethal form of the disease [9].

Unfortunately, cutaneous leishmaniasis is thought to be less dangerous, and because of it, it is believed to potentially lead to a spontaneous cure. Several cases, however, evolve to the mucocutaneous form of the diseases, just like observed in infections caused by the L. braziliensis. This clinical manifestation is characterized by deforming lesions that often compromise the patient’s social life.

Moreover, leishmania species from the L. mexicana complex are widely known to be resistant to treatment, mainly those based on in situ free-radical production, as is the case of nitroderivatives. Such mechanism of action implies low selectivity and, consequently, a broad panel of side effects. Ironically, several of the promising new compounds explored against trypanosomatidae parasites are nitroaromatic compounds [30, 31].

Finding compounds that are active against such parasites with IC50 values lower than 10 μM and with good toxicological profile is still a challenging task. From this point of view, the 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazole scaffold arises as a non-nitroaromatic alternative to the development of new antileishmanial drugs.

Conclusion

Considering the results herein reported, the 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazoles might be potential scaffolds to be explored in the search for new antileishmanial hits. Four out of the eight tested compounds exhibited important anti-promastigote activity associated with good selectivity indexes, except in the cases of compounds 1 and 6 (in the latter, only when considering its activity against L929 cells).

This is the first report of their effectiveness against the L. amazonensis, one of the species of leishmania responsible for the cutaneous form of the disease. Currently, studies using the most promising compounds have been conducted to evaluate their effects on the amastigote form of the parasite, which is found in the mammalian host. Such tests are important and fundamental for a better evaluation of the applicability of the compounds for the treatment of leishmaniasis.

The 4-phenyl-2-aminothiazole scaffold arises, as discussed, as a non-nitroaromatic alternative to the development of new antileishmanial drugs. As scaffolds, these structures could be rationally modified to present selectivity along with improved antileishmanial activity, since the differences between the binding sites of the human and leishmania phosphorylases can be explored.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to FAPESP for the financial support (FAPESP 2013/01875-0), and to CAPES and CNPq for the grants.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the financial support (FAPESP 2013/01875–0) and for the software licenses, when applicable; and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the grants of MOLC and PFS (PIBIC).

The publication of this work was also partially supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) through Programa Editoração CAPES (edital n. 13/2016, auxílio n. 0722/2017, processo n. 88881.142062/2017–01) and by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) through Programa Editorial CNPq/CAPES (chamada n. 26/2017, processo n. 440954/2017–7).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed equally to the final version of the manuscript. CAR, PFdS, MOLdC, and TFAP developed the synthetic, structural and activity relationships and molecular modeling studies under the supervision of Dr. DGGR. Dr. PX and MMG were in charge of both the antileishmanial assays and the cytotoxicity assay against THP-1 and L929 cell lines. Dr. JdM and AM developed the cytotoxicity assays on Vero cells. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua São Nicolau, 210, 2o andar, Diadema, SP, 09913-030, Brazil
(2)
Laboratory of Cellular Immunology and Biochemistry of Fungi, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua São Nicolau, 210, 2o andar, Diadema, SP, 09913-030, Brazil
(3)
Research Group of Neglected Diseases, University of Guarulhos, Praça Tereza Cristina, 88, Guarulhos, SP, 07020-071, Brazil

References

  1. World Health Organization – Leishmaniasis. http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/en/. Accessed 24 Jan 2016.
  2. World Health Organization. Control of the leishmaniasis: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, Geneva; 2010. p. 55–65.Google Scholar
  3. Croft SL. Public-private partnership: from there to here. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005;99(SUPPL 1):S9–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ghaemmaghami S, May BCH, Renslo AR, Prusiner SB. Discovery of 2-aminothiazoles as potent antiprion compounds. J Virol. 2010;84(7):3408–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02145-09.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Amnerkar ND, Bhusari KP. Synthesis of some thiazolyl aminobenzothiazole derivatives as potential antibacterial, antifungal and anthelmintic agents. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2011;26(1):22–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Khan KM, Ambreen N, Karim A, Saied S, Amyn A, Ahmed A, et al. Schiff bases of thiazole as antibacterial and antifungal agents. J Pharm Res. 2012;5(1):651–6.Google Scholar
  7. Gorczynski MJ, Leal RM, Mooberry SL, Bushweller JH, Brown ML. Synthesis and evaluation of substituted 4-aryloxy- and 4-arylsulfanyl-phenyl-2-aminothiazoles as inhibitors of human breast cancer cell proliferation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12(5):1029–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Karabasanagouda T, Vasudeva A. Synthesis of some new 2-(4-alkylthiophenoxy)-4-substituded-1,3-thiazoles as possible anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agents. Indian J Chem. 2008;47(1):144–52.Google Scholar
  9. Kaiser M, Maes L, Tadoori LP, Spangenberg T, Ioset JR. Repurposing of the open access malaria box for kinetoplastid diseases identifies novel active scaffolds against trypanosomatids. J Biomol Screen. 2015;20(5):634–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Papadopoulou MV, Bloomer WD, Rosenzweig HS, Wilkinson SR, Szular J, Kaiser M. Antitrypanosomal activity of 5-nitro-2-aminothiazole-based compounds. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;117:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.04.010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilbao-Ramos P, Galiana-Roselló C, Dea-Ayuela MA, González-Alvarez M, Vega C, Rolón M, et al. Nuclease activity and ultrastructural effects of new sulfonamides with anti-leishmanial and trypanocidal activities. Parasitol Int. 2012;61(4):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2012.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hantzsch A, Weber JH. Ueber Verbindungen des Thiasola (Pyridine der Thiophenreihe). Dtsch Chem Gesellschaft. 1887;20:3118–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll King L, Hlavacek RJ. The reaction of ketones with iodine and thiourea. J Am Chem Soc. 1950;72(8):3722–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Directorate E, Meeting J, The OF, Committee C, Working THE, On P. Guidance document on using cytotoxicity tests to estimate starting doses for acute oral systemic toxicity tests. Organ Econ Co-operation Dev [Internet]. 2010;129:1–54. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf?cote=env/jm/mono(2010)46&doclanguage=en Google Scholar
  15. Lall N, Henley-Smith CJ, De Canha MN, Oosthuizen CB, Berrington D. Viability reagent, prestoblue, in comparison with other available reagents, utilized in cytotoxicity and antimicrobial assays. Int J Microbiol. 2013;2013:Article ID 420601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. de Moraes J, Dario BS, Couto RAA, Pinto PLS, da Costa Ferreira AM. Antischistosomal activity of oxindolimine-metal complexes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(10):6648–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. de Brito MRM, Peláez WJ, Faillace MS, Militão GCG, Almeida JRGS, Argüello GA, et al. Cyclohexene-fused 1,3-oxazines with selective antibacterial and antiparasitic action and low cytotoxic effects. Toxicol in Vitro. 2017;44:273–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.07.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. MarvinSketch (version 6.2.2), calculation module developed by ChemAxon. 2014. http://www.chemaxon.com/products/marvin/marvinsketch/.
  19. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, et al. Gaussian 09. Revision D.1. Wallingford: Gaussian, Inc; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Yap CW. PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J Comput Chem. 2011;32(7):1466–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu X, Ouyang S, Yu B, Liu Y, Huang K, Gong J, et al. PharmMapper server: a web server for potential drug target identification using pharmacophore mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Web Server issue):W609–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol. 1997;267(3):727–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Appleby TC, Erion MD, Ealick SE. The structure of human 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase at 1.7 a resolution provides insights into substrate binding and catalysis. Structure. 1999;7(6):629–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Della Ragione F, Russo G, Oliva A, Mastropietro S, Mancini A, Borrelli A, et al. 5′-Deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase and p16INK4 deficiency in multiple tumor cell lines. Oncogene. 1995;10(5):827–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams-Ashman HG, Seidenfeld J, Galletti P. Trends in the biochemical pharmacology of 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine. Biochem Pharmacol. 1982;31(3):277–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Carrera CJ, Eddy RL, Shows TB, Carson DA. Assignment of the gene for methylthioadenosine phosphorylase to human chromosome 9 by mouse-human somatic cell hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81(9):2665–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Della Ragione F, Oliva A, Palumbo R, Russo GL, Gragnaniello V, Zappia V. Deficiency of 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase activity in malignancy. Absence of the protein in human enzyme-deficient cell lines. Biochem J. 1992;281(Pt 2):533–8. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2810533.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamatani N, Nelson-Rees WA, Carson DA. Selective killing of human malignant cell lines deficient in methylthioadenosine phosphorylase, a purine metabolic enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(2):1219–23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.2.1219.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rando DG, Avery MA, Tekwani BL, Khan SI, Ferreira EI. Antileishmanial activity screening of 5-nitro-2-heterocyclic benzylidene hydrazides. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16(14):6724–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Soong L, Henard CA, Melby PC. Immunopathogenesis of non-healing American cutaneous leishmaniasis and progressive visceral leishmaniasis. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(6):735–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement